Skip to content
The Bh-Eh Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Bh-Eh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$403kInternational$105kRecreation & Sports$80kHuman Services$36kHealth$32kCivil Rights$25kEducation$19kYouth Development$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$438k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$24,500
T BAR M CAMPS & RETREATS$10,000
YOUNG LIFE OF SAN ANTONIO$9,500
SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST$7,600
MT AIRY CENTER$6,300
TROUT UNLIMITED$5,000
LIFETIME RECOVERY$5,000
ALSACST JUDE$2,500
LAUNCH GLOBAL$2,400
ETHNOS360$2,219
THE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$875
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$500
THE SISTER CONCETTA FUND$500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND BREAKFAST$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPURS GIVE: $5k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $2k → 16%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$630k · 24 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
23

Total granted

$630k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
0%

Still filing today

33%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LAUNCH GLOBAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +117%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY
    3× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +150%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • NC
    NEW CREATION WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k
  • RT
    Remember the Alamo Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
3
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
4
San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries Inc

Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.

—
5
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
6
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
9
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
10
Still Water Christian Ministries Inc

To offer Kingdom partners a holy and unforgettable experience at our Texas Hill Country retreat and camp facility highlighting the still waters of God's majestic creation.

Recreation & Sports
11
Genesis Ministries Inc

A church with community outreach to help impact people so that they understand their purpose and realize they have the spiritual authority to positively impact their culture rather than having that culture impact and change them as our…

Youth Development
12
Shalom of Texas Ministries

To reach the texas capitol community for christ

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sa Life Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $246,500 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHTHE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $68,425 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONT BAR M CAMPS & RETREATS: $60,000 · OtherT BAR M CAMPS & RETREATSNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONSTONEWORKS INTERNATIONAL: $36,150 · OtherSTONEWORKS INTERNATIONALMT AIRY CENTER: $32,900 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $31,000 · OtherTEXAS CAVALIERS FOUNDATION: $25,450 · Other+26 more: $108,929 · Other+26 moreLAUNCH GLOBAL: $21,032 · ReligionGLORYVIEW RANCH MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 · ReligionCANYON MINISTRIES: $3,500 · ReligionCHRIST HEALING CENTER MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Religion+2 more: $1,300 · ReligionSAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY: $12,500 · HealthBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,050 · HealthEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthRemember the Alamo Foundation: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPURS GIVE: $7,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationTrinity University: $200 · EducationFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 · InternationalTelos Group Inc: $500 · International
Other$659,354Religion$31,832Health$25,550Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$8,000Education$2,200International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $21,032 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $8,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPURS GIVE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGLORYVIEW RANCH MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCANYON MINISTRIES: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSA Life Academy: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST HEALING CENTER MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOOLBOX MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBrackenridge Park Conservancy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTelos Group Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope and Healing Center & Institute: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAMOND DACHSHUND RESCUE OF TEXAS: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity University: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds SPURS GIVE ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLORYVIEW RANCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CANYON MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SA Life Academy ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST HEALING CENTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOOLBOX MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…The Texas Cavaliers C…The Brown Foundation …Christian Community F…King Family FoundationCircle Bar FoundationPryor Myra Stafford C…Betty Stieren Kelso F…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Greater Houston Commu…RICHTER RESPONSIBILIT…Pat & Tom Frost Found…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX35.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · King Family Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · RICHTER RESPONSIBILITY FUND FKA Holt Family Foundation · Pat & Tom Frost Foundation F0731600

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bh-Eh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bh-Eh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bh-Eh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home