Skip to content
The Beall Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Beall Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$567kPhilanthropy$358kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$1kReligion$500Crime & Legal$250
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $208k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPHA OMICRON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA THETA EDUCATION FUND$105,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$103,000
BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION$20,000
DUNCAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$2,500
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OH
CO
MD
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 6 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$459k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-2%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $369k · revenue -126%
  • BT
    BETA THETA PI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $73k · revenue +88%
  • AH
    ALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue -14%

Funded once

  • DR
    DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +77%
  • TH
    Texas Health Resources Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +116%
  • OB
    OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
4
Texas Health Physicians Group

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Baylor Oral Health Foundation

The baylor oral health foundation was established to foster and support the activities and program of the texas a&m university college of dentistry (the college) to provide financial support for excellence at the college, and to advance…

Health
6
Texas Hospital Association Foundation

To provide support, tools and resources necessary to improve patient safety and quality of care and accelerate improvement in health care through collaboration, education, innovation and research.

Health
7
Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Texas Health Research & Education Institute

Conduct medical research, offer educational programs and undertake development projects that contribute to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease.

Health
9
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Southwestern Health Resources

To further the missions of utsw and thr on a local, regional and national level through the creation of a clinically integrated network of physicians, hospitals and other care providers to deliver healthcare across the continuum and by…

Health
12
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Hands of Healing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $368,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $73,000 · EducationBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,793 · EducationCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $353,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyALPHA OMICRON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA THETA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $105,000 · OtherALPHA OMICRON C…ALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS: $11,000 · OtherALEXANDER HAMIL…+8 more: $11,055 · Other+8 moreDUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthTexas Health Resources Foundation: $4,000 · HealthTexas Health Resources: $1,250 · Health+2 more: $1,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human ServicesCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $250 · Civil Rights
Education$445,293Philanthropy$358,000Other$127,055Health$18,750Human Services$2,500Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $368,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $353,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION: $73,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS: $11,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,793 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUNCAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTexas Health Resources: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStar-Telegram Charities Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL HANDS OF HEALING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beall Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beall Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home