Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barth Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MHousing & Shelter$365kHuman Services$246kEnvironment$238kCommunity Improvement$212kArts & Culture$182kSocial Science$170kYouth Development$139kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $206k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$47,500
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION$25,000
VISTA DEL MAR$18,500
OCEANA FOUNDATION$15,000
LOS ANGELES BALLET$15,000
ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW YORK JETS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
THE COUNTRY FRIENDS$10,000
LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION$10,000
MIRACLE BABIES$10,000
UNION RESCUE MISSION$10,000
MANTEGNA FAMILY FOUNDATION$6,000
SAVE OUR SCHOOLS$5,000
AXEALS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $608k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $100k → 14%VISION MEXICO: $5k → 7%STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $70k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%MIRACLE BABIES: $25k → 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $40k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $20k → 14%MIRACLE BABIES: $10k → 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $19k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $75k → 14%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $15k → 14%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $3k → 17%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 25 repeat orgs$630k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
44

Total granted

$2.5M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+29%

Still filing today

80%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $365k · revenue +155%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2018–2024 · $275k · revenue +52%
  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $160k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATIONAL RESOUCES FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • SB
    SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • RC
    RADY'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
3
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
12
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The V Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Aoki Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
36/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FASTER CURES: $300,000 · OtherFASTER CURESCITY OF HOPE: $217,400 · OtherCITY OF HOPETHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $160,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $123,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $115,000 · OtherTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESSNATIONAL RESOUCES FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN: $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL RESOUCES FOUNDATION OF WISCONSINIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · Other+37 more: $508,075 · Other+37 moreUNION RESCUE MISSION: $365,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSIONVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $93,500 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AN…STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $79,500 · Human ServicesSTARS AND STRIPES CHIL…MIRACLE BABIES: $35,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE BABIES+5 more: $35,250 · Human Services+5 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $275,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI…CHOC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Health+8 more: $46,000 · Health+8 morePROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyCHASE FOUNDATION MACK C CHASE TRUSTEE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGOOD PROJECTS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMANTEGNA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,750 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $31,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureThe Ocean Foundation: $80,000 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $30,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $27,500 · EnvironmentORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $106,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,578,475Human Services$608,250Health$336,000Philanthropy$191,750Arts & Culture$172,000Environment$137,500Crime & Legal$106,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $365,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $275,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $160,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $115,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $106,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $93,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $79,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $70,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK JETS FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMIRACLE BABIES: $35,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHASE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COUNTRY FRIENDS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHASE FOUNDATION MACK C CHASE TRUSTEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD HUMAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD PROJECTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRACE TO ERASE MS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMANTEGNA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,750 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetaxeALS Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVISION MEXICO DBA CENTRO FOX: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISIONS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CREATOR SHARE CHARITY: $4,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $2,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI WESTSIDE LA: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAOKI FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK JETS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE BABIES ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CYSTINOSIS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Michael and Lori Milken Family FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Michael and Lori Milken Family Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Kerr Family Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · Greater Horizons · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barth Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph