Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Barrett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$88kYouth Development$16kHuman Services$9kInternational$3kEmployment$3kCommunity Improvement$2kRecreation & Sports$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $604
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$348k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$30,800
ST CHRISTOPHER ACADEMY$500
TRINITY COLLEGE$100
Individual grant recipient$4
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WEBSTER HOUSE: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121k · 33 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
24

Total granted

$121k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
0%

Still filing today

36%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +71%
  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +13%
  • MP
    MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • SN
    SOUTHERN NH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • Franconia Ski Club
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -17%
  • WH
    WEBSTER HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

2
Hampshire College Trustees

The mission of hampshire college is to foster a lifelong passion for learning, inquiry, and ethical citizenship that inspires students to contribute to knowledge, justice, and positive change in the world and, by doing so, to transform…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Manchester University Inc

Manchester University respects the infinite worth of every individual and graduates persons of ability and conviction who draw upon their education and faith to lead principled, productive, and compassionate lives that improve the human…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire University and the most unlike its peers is National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNew Hampshire Advocacy & Ci…Regional Land ConservationCommunity Health & Resident…Service Club Charitable Fun…Supportive Housing ProvidersYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Camps & Recreation Ce…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr11%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr20%14%20–35yr15%27%35–55yr18%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr11%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr20%6%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr18%87%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/27
the rest of the field
8%
343/4,326

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL — $65,800 · OtherTRINITY HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES NH — $6,300 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES NH+44 more — $29,979 · Other+44 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $8,970 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $5,250 · Youth DevelopmentMANCHESTER P…UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $6,200 · EducationUNIVERSIT…SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationSAINT ANS…Southern New Hampshire University — $1,936 · EducationSouthern …TRINITY COLLEGE — $900 · EducationTRINITY C…Franconia Ski Club — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION — $500 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ALLEN INC — $250 · Recreation & SportsWEBSTER HOUSE — $1,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $800 · InternationalJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS — $375 · Animals
Other$102,079Youth Development$14,220Education$11,036Recreation & Sports$1,750Human Services$1,000International$800Animals$375

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $8,970 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $6,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $5,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL - MANCHESTER — $1,995 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University — $1,936 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYHEW — $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFranconia Ski Club — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEBSTER HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS — $375 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNational Ataxia Foundation Incorporated — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP ALLEN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamilies in Transition — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
  • Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
  • Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL - MANCHESTER
  • Who funds Southern New Hampshire University
  • Who funds MAYHEW
  • Who funds Franconia Ski Club
  • Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds COPPER CANNON CORPORATION
  • Who funds JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS
  • Who funds National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated
  • Who funds HOOKSETT COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds Liberty House Inc
  • Who funds CAMP ALLEN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Granite United Way · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation · Southern New Hampshire University · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Barrett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • University of Hartford1% of income from government
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Barrett Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Barrett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph