Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$539k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.6MHealth$417kYouth Development$166kArts & Culture$130kHuman Services$117kRecreation & Sports$100kEnvironment$64kCrime & Legal$32kScience & Tech$25kOther$1.3M
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $305k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERRIMACK COLLEGE$200,000
MERRIMACK VALLEY YMCA$55,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL$50,000
SAINT JOSEPH'S PRESERVATION SOCIETY$30,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF CONCORD$25,000
CASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY$20,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER LAWRENCE FOUNDATION$10,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER LAKES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BOW FOUNDATION$10,000
BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY$9,000
NASHUA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$7,500
LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH$5,200
HOME POSSIBLE PROJECT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF CARROL COUNTY: $5k → 9%WEBSTER HOUSE: $12k → 7%LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT: $25k → 9%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%BELKNAP HOUSE: $20k → 9%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%BELKNAP HOUSE: $15k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $15k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
OH
MO
VA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 33 repeat orgs$560k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
32

Total granted

$3.4M
$437k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+41%

Still filing today

61%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MERRIMACK COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +77%
  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +13%
  • NOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $150k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +88%
  • BR
    BREAD & ROSES SOUP KITCHEN OF LAWRENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CS
    CATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +183%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Disability Rights Center - Nh Inc

Disability rights center - new hampshire protects, advances, and strengthens the legal rights and advocacy interests of all people with disabilities.

Human Services
4
David's House Inc

To provide a home away from home and support for families with children receiving treatment through the children's hospital at dartmouth-hitchcock medical center.

Health
5
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
6
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
7
Bridgton Academy

To provide a program for young men in a unique, one-year postgraduate environment to prepare for the rigors of college and beyond.

Education
8
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

9
Children's Law Center of New Hampshire

To provide legal representation and social services advocacy to new hampshire low-income and underserved children across multiple legal contexts.

Crime & Legal
10
Northfield Mount Hermon School

Northfield mount hermon educates the head, heart and hands of our students. we engage their intellect, compassion, and talents, empowering them to act with humanity and purpose.

Education
11
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
12
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health

D-HH operates to establish, manage, govern, and fundraise for an integrated healthcare delivery System. To that end, D-HH is particularly focused to: - Manage the healthcare System to provide services to the public in the most…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Manchester Tactical Officers Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Healthcare Organiz…Higher Education Institutio…Youth Sports ProgramsBoston Neighborhood Steward…Professional Trade Associat…Vulnerable Population Suppo…Faith-Based Community Cente…Hospital Health SystemsEquity and Justice AdvocacyAcademic Medical Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr13%10%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr15%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr15%68%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
11%
2,182/19,566

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MERRIMACK COLLEGE — $1,400,000 · EducationMERRIMACK COLLEGENOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC — $150,000 · EducationNOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC+4 more — $37,200 · EducationMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $300,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LAKES REGION — $145,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE LAKES REGIONKIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER LAWRENCE FOUNDATION — $120,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER LAWRENCE FOUNDAT…HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $99,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOLBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE — $90,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCEIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherBREAD & ROSES SOUP KITCHEN OF LAWRENCE — $50,000 · OtherLAHEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $50,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF CONCORD — $50,000 · OtherCATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC — $50,000 · Other+47 more — $387,611 · Other+47 moreLAHEY CLINIC HOSPITAL INC — $250,000 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC…LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · HealthLAHEY CLINIC…THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $20,200 · HealthTHE BOW FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthNAMI National — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $12,000 · HealthMERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentNashua Police Athletic League — $7,500 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBELKNAP MILL SOCIETY — $109,650 · Arts & CultureCASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBelknap House — $60,000 · Human ServicesLAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesWEBSTER HOUSE — $17,000 · Human ServicesThe Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME POSSIBLE PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Giving Foundation Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesCAMP ALLEN INC — $79,000 · Recreation & SportsAbenaki Outing Club — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKES REGION DISABLED SPORTS AT GU — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,587,200Other$1,417,111Health$417,200Youth Development$165,500Arts & Culture$129,650Human Services$117,000Recreation & Sports$99,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMERRIMACK COLLEGE — $1,400,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC HOSPITAL INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $140,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBELKNAP MILL SOCIETY — $109,650 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP ALLEN INC — $79,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBelknap House — $60,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetTILTON SCHOOL — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $20,559 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $20,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOW FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPURE WATER FOR THE WORLD INC — $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWEBSTER HOUSE — $17,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAbenaki Outing Club — $15,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAMI National — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee — $13,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNashua Police Athletic League — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Child Advocacy Center of Carroll County — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HOME POSSIBLE PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetThe Giving Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLAKES REGION DISABLED SPORTS AT GU — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCIRCLE PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST AFRICAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBRIGID'S HOUSE OF HOPE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVINGA FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetADVANTAGE KIDS — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERRIMACK COLLEGE
  • Who funds LAHEY CLINIC HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY
  • Who funds LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMP ALLEN INC
  • Who funds Belknap House
  • Who funds CATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds TILTON SCHOOL
  • Who funds LAKES REGION CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC
  • Who funds AVIATION & AEROSPACE EDUCATION CENTER AT WINNIPESAUKEE
  • Who funds THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE
  • Who funds THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE BOW FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY
  • Who funds PURE WATER FOR THE WORLD INC
  • Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE
  • Who funds Abenaki Outing Club
  • Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds NAMI National
  • Who funds Loon Preservation Committee
  • Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH38.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Greater Lakes Region Charitable Fund for Children Inc · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Granite United Way · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The McIninch Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • West African Research Association13% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Hospital Inc3% of income from government
  • Merrimack College1% of income from government
  • The Fessenden School0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Anthony & Gladys Sakowich Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph