Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barnwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$750k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$950kFood & Nutrition$885kEnvironment$760kAnimals$545kPublic Safety & Disaster$542kHealth$410kCivil Rights$285kHuman Services$281kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $465k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT AND ALUMNI RELATIONS$200,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$45,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$40,000
BETHLEHEM LAND TRUST$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$30,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT$25,000
FARM FORWARD$25,000
ASPCA$20,000
HSUS$20,000
THE BETHLEHEM SCHOLARSHIP FUND$20,000
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC$20,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD$15,000
RODALE INSITUTE$10,000
BETHLEHEM CONSERVATION COMMISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20k → 8%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $10k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $10k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 65 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
18

Total granted

$5.3M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+7%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BETHLEHEM LAND TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +340% · 54% of their budget
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $255k · revenue +50%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL'S SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +127%
  • UN
    UNITED NATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
6
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Forward Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/48
Grantees still filing
39/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT AND ALUMNI RELATIONS: $650,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT AND ALUMNI RELATIONSBETHLEHEM LAND TRUST INC: $305,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM LAND TRUST INCLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT: $227,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENTTHE BETHLEHEM SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $140,000 · OtherFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $180,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $140,000 · Other+59 more: $1,769,000 · Other+59 moreHumane World for Animals Inc: $180,000 · AnimalsHumane World …FARM FORWARD INC: $175,000 · AnimalsFARM FORWARD …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $170,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN …FOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC): $85,000 · AnimalsFOOD ANIMAL C…ANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HOPE A…CITY HARVEST INC: $150,000 · Food & NutritionRodale Institute: $140,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $80,000 · Food & NutritionConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $35,000 · Food & NutritionPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $255,000 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $60,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthHEALING HOOFBEATS OF CT INC: $25,000 · HealthAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · Civil RightsMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $70,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $220,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $20,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ZARA'S CENTER: $15,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $115,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $90,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $40,000 · Environment
Other$3,411,000Animals$660,000Food & Nutrition$405,000Health$365,000Civil Rights$280,000International$255,000Environment$245,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHLEHEM LAND TRUST INC: $305,000 over 9y, 54% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $255,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetFARM FORWARD INC: $175,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $170,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRodale Institute: $140,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $115,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $95,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC): $85,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetFeeding America: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri: $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc: $45,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEL-AIR ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetJuntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGarment Worker Center: $30,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING HOOFBEATS OF CT INC: $25,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONG FOODLA KITCHEN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPAIDEIA INSTITUTE FOR HUMANISTIC STUDY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHIAS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP BEL AIR BEAUTIFUL: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetATHLETE ALLY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZARA'S CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA RESTAURANT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WHITBY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETHLEHEM LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC) ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Stone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barnwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barnwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Barnwood Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Barnwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph