Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Barbara W and Philip R Derrow Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$239k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$629kEducation$472kRecreation & Sports$51kReligion$25kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$4k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$80,000
NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$75,000
COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY$30,000
CHABAD OF COLUMBUS INC$25,000
FLYING HORSE FARMS$15,000
NEW ALBANY-PLAIN LOCAL SCHOOLS$13,687
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFETOWN: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$518k · 6 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +143% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$518k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+143%
+37%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +23%
  • CM
    COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $77k · revenue +143%
  • FH
    FLYING HORSE FARMS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COLUMBUS ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +48%
  • LT
    Life Town Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +103%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR FAMILY SAFETY AND HEALING
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
4
Columbus State University Foundation Inc

The Columbus State University Foundation supports educational excellence and the expansion of educational opportunities at Columbus State University. The Foundation attracts, receives, invests, manages, and expends gifts and other…

Education
5
Columbus School for Girls

In fulfillment of our mission and philosophy we strive to embrace the vitality of a diverse community and provide a curriculum that reflects multiple cultures and global connectedness; Develop leadership capacity and instill a commitment…

Education
6
Cleveland State University Foundation

The foundation exists primarily to raise, receive, and manage private gifts for the advancement and benefit of cleveland state university and its students and faculty. our mission is to improve access to higher education and the quality of…

Education
7
The Ohio University Foundation

The Ohio University Foundation was established in 1945 to support the mission of Ohio University, the first institution of higher education in the Northwest Territory. Ohio University holds as its central purpose the intellectual and…

Education
8
Ohio Collegiate Academy

Our vision is to create a culture of high expectations for behavior and academics through rigorous, research-based curricula and a focus on achievement. It is our goal that Ohio College Preparatory School scholars will attend a college…

Education
9
Autism Academy of Learning

To promote a higher quality of life, and the realization of the full intellectual and social development of students with autism spectrum disorder. The school is structured to provide every student with autism spectrum disorder an…

Education
10
Columbus Torah Academy

The mission is to promote a strong, comprehensive jewish education, within an orthodox framework, that inspires learning, living and growing in judaism; provide a broad based, high quality, secular education designed to impart the critical…

Education
11
Columbus College of Art & Design

Ccad fosters a diverse community that educates students so they can unleash their creative power to shape culture and commerce.

Education
12
Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment

Revitalization of the area immediately adjacent to the ohio state university's main campus in columbus, ohio.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbus Metropolitan Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Oakstone Academy Palm Beach Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $627,688 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more — $4,000 · PhilanthropyOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $225,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $76,830 · EducationCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY…+4 more — $6,900 · EducationCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY — $120,000 · OtherCOLUMBUS METROP…NEW ALBANY-PLAIN LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT — $43,033 · OtherNEW ALBANY-PLAI…+2 more — $2,550 · OtherFLYING HORSE FARMS — $49,500 · Recreation & SportsChabad of Columbus Inc — $25,000 · ReligionLife Town Inc — $5,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$631,688Education$308,730Other$165,583Recreation & Sports$49,500Religion$25,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $627,688 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS METROPOLITAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $76,830 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS — $49,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLife Town Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTAR HOUSE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKSTONE ACADEMY PALM BEACH CORPORATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Siemer Family Foundation · Safelite Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation · M I Homes Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Barbara W and Philip R Derrow Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 26%
  • Life Town Inc26% of income from government
  • Oakstone Academy Palm Beach Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph