Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bahl & Gaynor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$593kEducation$58kReligion$54kArts & Culture$45kCrime & Legal$31kHuman Services$26kYouth Development$24kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,055
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
SOCIETY OF THE TRANSFIGURATION$40,000
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$16,850
ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTEERS$15,380
DAV 5K$10,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,850
CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$8,500
OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION$7,500
FRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL$6,000
FC CINCINNATI$5,600
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER$4,500
AFMDA$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MARGARET HALL: $4k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 16%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
CA
KY
VA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$723k · 17 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$723k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

65%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • TC
    The Christ Hospital Foundation
    2× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +239%
  • LY
    LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • TW
    TRI-STATE WARBIRD MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +27%
  • AF
    ABA FUND FOR JUSTICE & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
4
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

5
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
6
Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc

Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.

Animals
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
9
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
10
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
11
Cincinnati Christian University

The mission of cincinnati christian university is to teach men and women to live by biblical principles and to equip and empower them with character, skills, insight, and vision to lead the church and to impact society for christ.

12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Cincinnati Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Soupe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Funding and AccessTheater & Performing ArtsYouth Residential CareIndependent K-12 SchoolsRegional Business AdvocacyCincinnati Community Develo…Emergency Food & Basic Assi…Healthcare Providers and Ac…Cincinnati Cultural Institu…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%6%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr15%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%10%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr15%26%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/32
the rest of the field
13%
843/6,498

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
12/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $514,333 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERSOCIETY OF THE TRANSFIGURATION — $40,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF THE TRANSFIGURATION+34 more — $165,218 · Other+34 moreAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $19,000 · HealthThe Christ Hospital Foundation — $16,500 · HealthBEECHWOOD HOME — $6,000 · HealthTHE CINCINNATI HEALTH NETWORK INC — $2,500 · Health+1 more — $1,125 · HealthCincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $17,572 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL — $12,750 · Arts & CultureTRI-STATE WARBIRD MUSEUM — $10,750 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts — $3,055 · Arts & CultureXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $19,850 · EducationCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $6,450 · EducationMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY — $3,375 · EducationCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $2,250 · EducationRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC — $8,500 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES — $6,500 · Human ServicesST MARGARET HALL — $4,000 · Human ServicesOHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION — $17,500 · Crime & LegalTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$719,551Health$45,125Arts & Culture$44,127Education$31,925Human Services$19,000Crime & Legal$17,500Philanthropy$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $19,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $17,572 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation — $16,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUSIC HALL — $12,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTRI-STATE WARBIRD MUSEUM — $10,750 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $6,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEECHWOOD HOME — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Parks Foundation — $4,950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCISE — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARGARET HALL — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Bar Association — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY — $3,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI HEALTH NETWORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative — $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA SOUPE INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH29.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Fidelity Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Hcs Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bahl & Gaynor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bahl & Gaynor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bahl & Gaynor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph