Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Babcox Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$419k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$945kHousing & Shelter$576kPhilanthropy$536kHuman Services$510kArts & Culture$367kYouth Development$318kReligion$194kEducation$176kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $404k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE HOUSE$40,000
THE WELL$40,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY$40,000
EMBRACING FUTURES$40,000
BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER$34,000
STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTY$30,000
ACCESS INC$25,000
VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO$20,000
BRIGHT STAR BOOKS$20,000
OPEN M$15,000
DIRECTION HOME$15,000
NAMI SUMMIT COUNTY$10,000
VANTAGE AGING$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $794k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $11k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $30k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $25k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $25k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%OPEN M: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%OPEN M: $8k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $4k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $34k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $33k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $33k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $25k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 24 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$3.3M
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-4%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +38%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +46%
  • EF
    EMBRACING FUTURES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • UD
    UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -4%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF METRO PARKS
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -66%
  • SS
    ST SEBASTIAN PARISH
    one grant, 2024 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
3
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
4
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Nami of Southwest Ohio

Provide education, support and advocacy to those affected by mental illness.

Health
6
Ohio District 5 Area Agency On Aging Inc

The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…

—
7
Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc

To improve the quality of life for the citizens of summit county, particularly african americans, by advocating and facilitating programs that are economically and educationally transformational, impacting their lives and the lives of…

Human Services
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Emerge Ministries Inc

To help people discover a lifestyle of meaning joy and fulfillment through treatment and training. emerge ministries inc. is devoted to serving our clients. this service encompasses a biblically based mental health center with…

Human Services
10
Ohio Disability Rights Law & Policy Center Inc

To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.

Civil Rights
11
Psa 3 Agency On Aging

To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.

—
12
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE HOUSE: $230,000 · OtherGRACE HOUSEUniversity of Michigan: $225,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganACCESS INC: $212,500 · OtherACCESS INCTHE WELL: $180,000 · OtherTHE WELLBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $170,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER EAST OHIO AREA CHAPTER: $155,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER EAST OHIO AREA CH…SALVATION ARMY: $125,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $70,000 · OtherNAMI Summit County: $66,000 · OtherSWAG (STUDENTS WITH A GOAL) AKRON: $60,000 · Other+11 more: $145,650 · Other+11 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMI…HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $210,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AND HEALING SURVIV…VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $145,500 · Human ServicesVICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGR…SOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC: $82,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH STREET MNISTRIES …OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $62,500 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUM…VANTAGE AGING: $43,750 · Human ServicesVANTAGE AGINGAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $505,750 · PhilanthropyAKRON COMMUNITY…STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC: $367,000 · Arts & CultureSTAN HYWET …EMBRACING FUTURES INC: $239,752 · HealthEMBRACING…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $60,250 · HealthPLANNED P…BRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC: $160,500 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,639,150Human Services$794,250Philanthropy$505,750Arts & Culture$367,000Health$300,002Education$160,500Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $505,750 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC: $367,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $250,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetEMBRACING FUTURES INC: $239,752 over 9y, 11% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $225,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetACCESS INC: $212,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $210,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC: $160,500 over 9y, 17% of budgetVICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $145,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC: $82,500 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetNAMI Summit County: $66,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY: $62,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $60,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVANTAGE AGING: $43,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNational Ataxia Foundation Incorporated: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF METRO PARKS: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AKRON GARDEN CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACING FUTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Summit County ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
  • Who funds VANTAGE AGING ↗
  • Who funds National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF METRO PARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE AKRON GARDEN CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH37.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Gar Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Lehner Family Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Glenn R & Alice V Boggess Memorial · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · United Way of Summit and Medina · The Rc Musson and Katharine Musson Charitable Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Babcox Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Babcox Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Babcox Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph