Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Babcox Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$419k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$945kHousing & Shelter$576kPhilanthropy$536kHuman Services$510kArts & Culture$367kYouth Development$318kReligion$194kEducation$176kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $404k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE HOUSE$40,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY$40,000
EMBRACING FUTURES$40,000
THE WELL$40,000
BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER$34,000
STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTY$30,000
VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$25,000
ACCESS INC$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO$20,000
BRIGHT STAR BOOKS$20,000
DIRECTION HOME$15,000
OPEN M$15,000
NAMI SUMMIT COUNTY$10,000
VANTAGE AGING$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $794k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $25k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $11k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $40k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $30k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $25k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $25k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $20k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%OPEN M: $15k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $15k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $10k → 13%OPEN M: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%OPEN M: $8k → 13%SOUTH STREET MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $4k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $34k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $33k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $33k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $25k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $20k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 24 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$3.3M
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-4%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +38%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +46%
  • EF
    EMBRACING FUTURES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • UD
    UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -4%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF METRO PARKS
    one grant, 2022 · $250 · revenue -66%
  • SS
    ST SEBASTIAN PARISH
    one grant, 2024 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
3
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
4
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Nami of Southwest Ohio

Provide education, support and advocacy to those affected by mental illness.

Health
6
Ohio District 5 Area Agency On Aging Inc

The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…

7
Akron Community Service Center & Urban League Inc

To improve the quality of life for the citizens of summit county, particularly african americans, by advocating and facilitating programs that are economically and educationally transformational, impacting their lives and the lives of…

Human Services
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Emerge Ministries Inc

To help people discover a lifestyle of meaning joy and fulfillment through treatment and training. emerge ministries inc. is devoted to serving our clients. this service encompasses a biblically based mental health center with…

Human Services
10
Ohio Disability Rights Law & Policy Center Inc

To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.

Civil Rights
11
Psa 3 Agency On Aging

To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.

12
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%10%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr17%38%35–55yr17%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%8%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr17%28%35–55yr17%47%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
420/3,221

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRACE HOUSE — $230,000 · OtherGRACE HOUSEUniversity of Michigan — $225,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganACCESS INC — $212,500 · OtherACCESS INCTHE WELL — $180,000 · OtherTHE WELLBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $170,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUMMIT COUNTYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER EAST OHIO AREA CHAPTER — $155,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER EAST OHIO AREA CH…SALVATION ARMY — $125,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $70,000 · OtherNAMI Summit County — $66,000 · OtherSWAG (STUDENTS WITH A GOAL) AKRON — $60,000 · Other+11 more — $145,650 · Other+11 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMI…HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER — $210,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AND HEALING SURVIV…VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC — $145,500 · Human ServicesVICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGR…SOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC — $82,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH STREET MNISTRIES …OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY — $62,500 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUM…VANTAGE AGING — $43,750 · Human ServicesVANTAGE AGINGAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $505,750 · PhilanthropyAKRON COMMUNITY…STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC — $367,000 · Arts & CultureSTAN HYWET …EMBRACING FUTURES INC — $239,752 · HealthEMBRACING…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $60,250 · HealthPLANNED P…BRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC — $160,500 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,639,150Human Services$794,250Philanthropy$505,750Arts & Culture$367,000Health$300,002Education$160,500Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $505,750 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC — $367,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC — $250,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetEMBRACING FUTURES INC — $239,752 over 9y, 11% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $225,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetACCESS INC — $212,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER — $210,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC — $160,500 over 9y, 17% of budgetVICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC — $145,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC — $82,500 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetNAMI Summit County — $66,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY — $62,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $60,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVANTAGE AGING — $43,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNational Ataxia Foundation Incorporated — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC — $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF METRO PARKS — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AKRON GARDEN CLUB — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC
  • Who funds EMBRACING FUTURES INC
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds ACCESS INC
  • Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds BRIGHT STAR BOOKS INC
  • Who funds VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds SOUTH STREET MNISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NAMI Summit County
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO
  • Who funds VANTAGE AGING
  • Who funds National Ataxia Foundation Incorporated
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF METRO PARKS
  • Who funds THE AKRON GARDEN CLUB

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH37.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Gar Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Lehner Family Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Glenn R & Alice V Boggess Memorial · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · United Way of Summit and Medina · The Rc Musson and Katharine Musson Charitable Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Babcox Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph