Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Azus Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$245kHealth$135kRecreation & Sports$97kEducation$80kHousing & Shelter$68kYouth Development$66kPhilanthropy$56kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,817
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISTA DEL MAR CHILD CARE SERVICES$50,380
BERKELEY FOUNDATION$18,428
CAMP TAWONGA$12,259
SF-MARIN FOOD BANK$10,998
SHARE OURSELVES$10,170
CORNER HEALTH CENTER$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$9,992
OZONE HOUSE$9,973
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FRANCISCO$9,907
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$9,045
UCI FOUNDATION$5,817
LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES$5,094
826 VALENCIA$5,085
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$5,000
PROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES VENTU: $5k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES VENTU: $3k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $10k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $5k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$954k · 25 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$954k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+311%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentReligionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +64%
  • OH
    OZONE HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +34%
  • CH
    CORNER HEALTH CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of Americagraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +311%
  • CY
    CA YOUTH CONNECTION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
3
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
4
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
5
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
10
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
11
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
12
Wu Yee Children's Services

Wu yee children's services ("wu yee") is a california not-for-profit corporation which primarily provides childcare and family services to low income families in san francisco, california. wu yee's programs operate out of twelve program…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Lowell Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISTA DEL MAR CHILD CARE SERVICES: $260,662 · OtherVISTA DEL MAR CHILD CARE SERVICESBERKELEY FOUNDATION: $71,997 · OtherBERKELEY FOUNDATIONSOS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $70,057 · OtherSOS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $65,100 · OtherCORNER HEALTH CENTERSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $32,063 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $26,588 · Other+15 more: $96,687 · Other+15 moreOZONE HOUSE INC: $69,973 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE IN…Larkin Street Youth Services: $32,646 · Human ServicesLarkin Street …Share Our Selves Corporation: $20,255 · Human ServicesShare Our Selv…PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $7,500 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FO…TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $104,116 · ReligionTAWONGA JEW…826 Valencia: $32,185 · Education826 Valenc…Lowell Alumni Association: $22,974 · EducationLowell Alu…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $20,432 · EducationUNIVERSITY…REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $15,125 · EducationREAL OPTIO…Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc: $19,992 · HealthENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,088 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $5,000 · EnvironmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $9,907 · Youth Development
Other$623,154Human Services$130,374Religion$104,116Education$90,716Health$19,992Environment$15,088Youth Development$9,907

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $104,116 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $69,973 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $65,100 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $32,646 over 6y, 0.0% of budget826 Valencia: $32,185 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $32,063 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLowell Alumni Association: $22,974 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $20,432 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $20,255 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAsian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc: $19,992 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS: $15,125 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $10,088 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $9,907 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES: $7,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Outreach and Recreation Program: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Lowell Alumni Association ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Outreach and Recreation Program ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Azus Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Azus Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Azus’ filings →

More from the funding graph