Skip to content
The Atsuhiko and Ina Goodwin Tateuchi Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Atsuhiko and Ina Goodwin Tateuchi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$385k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.6MEducation$535kHealth$395kEnvironment$250kInternational$107kRecreation & Sports$15kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $320k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SEATTLE FOUNDATION$120,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM$100,000
SEATTLE SYMPHONY$50,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$50,000
ASIAN ART MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
PBS HAWAII$20,000
JAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HAWAII$10,000
CHAMBER MUSIC HAWAII$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 7%NIHONMACHI LITTLE FRIENDS: $3k → 10%NIHONMACHI LITTLE FRIENDS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 17 repeat orgs$604k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$2.5M
$604k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+36%

Still filing today

76%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $700k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $527k · revenue +7%
  • JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM
    3× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BB
    BELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +105% · 30% of their budget
  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -15%
  • OM
    OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $95k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honolulu Museum of Art

To create relevant and transformative experiences through the study, preservation, presentation and creation of art.

Arts & Culture
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
6
Hawaii International Film Festival

To foster international cultural awareness and understanding through the medium of film. to act as a creative pipeline for hawaii and the pacific, showcasing new and emerging talent from hawaii, asia, americas, europe, and the pacific…

Arts & Culture
7
Hawaii Medical Association

Hawaii medical association is dedicated to serving physicians, their patients and community through representation, advocacy, and public service. core activities: advocacy, education

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Honolulu Festival Foundation

To promote, sponsor, maintain, develop, improve and protect the annual event known as the honolulu festival and other similar celebrations of cultural understanding, economic cooperation and racial harmony between and among the people of…

Arts & Culture
10
The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum

The mission of the isamu noguchi foundation and garden museum is to advance the understanding and appreciation of isamu noguchi's art and legacy.the isamu noguchi foundation and garden museum seeks to protect and preserve isamu noguchi's…

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
12
The Hawaii Japanese School

The school provides instruction to students who are of age to attend the compulsory education system of japan and to students who desire to learn the japanese language compatible with the standard educational curricula in japan; to enable…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Japanese Cultural Center of Hawaii; the most unlike its peers is American Foundation for the Blind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,525,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $700,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ART MUSEUMJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $300,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MU…HAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION DBA PBS HAWAII: $80,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUN…HAWAII SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA+5 more: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreSEATTLE SYMPHONY: $180,000 · OtherSEATTLE SYMPHONYDENSHO THE JAPANESE AMERICAN LEGACY PROJECT: $144,000 · OtherDENSHO THE JAPANESE…Individual grant recipient: $102,500 · OtherIndividual grant re…OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER: $95,000 · OtherOVERLAKE MEDICAL CE…WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherWING LUKE MEMORIAL …ASIAN ART MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCO: $75,000 · OtherASIAN ART MUSEUM OF…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $100,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION…+6 more: $29,735 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $527,482 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…+1 more: $8,000 · EducationBELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY: $250,000 · EnvironmentOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthJAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HAWAII: $94,000 · InternationalTHE JAPAN SOCIETY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,000 · International
Philanthropy$1,525,000Arts & Culture$1,230,000Other$801,235Education$535,482Environment$250,000Health$200,000International$107,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,525,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $700,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $527,482 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $300,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY: $250,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HAWAII: $94,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION DBA PBS HAWAII: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC HAWAII: $26,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetHAWAII OPERA THEATRE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII: $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JAPAN SOCIETY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNihonmachi Little Friends: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF OREGON: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kosasa FoundationSeattle FoundationJohn R Halligan Chari…The Cades FoundationFirst Insurance Compa…Cooke Foundation Limi…Tradewind Group Found…Atherton Family Found…Puget Sound Energy Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
Kosasa FoundationHI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kosasa Foundation · Seattle Foundation · John R Halligan Charitable Fund · The Cades Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · Tradewind Group Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Atsuhiko and Ina Goodwin Tateuchi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Atsuhiko and Ina Goodwin Tateuchi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Japanese American Museum of Oregon: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Atsuhiko and Ina Goodwin Tateuchi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home