· Public charity
The Atlanta Womens Foundation Inc
The mission of the atlanta women's foundation is to be a catalyst for change in the lives of women and girls.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE INC HELPING OTHER PEOPLE | $120,000 |
| ATLANTA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $100,000 |
| NICHOLAS HOUSE | $100,000 |
| CLAYTON STATE UNIVERISTY FDTN | $100,000 |
| PER SCHOLAS | $100,000 |
| WELLSPRING LIVING INC | $50,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN GEORGIA | $50,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER ATLANT | $50,000 |
| COOL GIRLS INC OF GREATER ATL | $50,000 |
| VOX TEEN COMMUNICATIONS | $50,000 |
| AGAPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT | $50,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF GREATER ATLANTA | $50,000 |
| LOS NINOS PRIMERO | $50,000 |
| SER FAMILIA INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNicholas House Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $515k · revenue +77%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC7× · 2018–2025 · $495k · revenue +20%
- HIHOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered6× · 2018–2025 · $423k · revenue +349% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- TDThe Drake House Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +28%
- WMWOMEN MOVING ON INC WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER TO END DVgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +73%
- ALATLANTA LEGAL AID SOCIETY INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Georgia Center for Opportunity GCO is an independent, non-partisan think tank dedicated to increasing opportunity and improving the quality of life for all Georgians.
To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24
YWCA Greater Atlanta is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…
To protect and empower immigrant survivors of crime and persecution.
The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…
To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society.
Provide victims of crime with comprehensive services for the successful transition of victim to survivor.
InCommunity provides meaningful support to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live safe, healthy, and joyful lives in their communities.
Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nicholas House Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered ↗
- Who funds CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Girls Inc of Greater Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GWINNETT TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds LiveSafe Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
- Who funds VOX TEEN COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SER FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds COOL GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Girls on the Run Georgia Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds LOS NIOS PRIMERO INC ↗
- Who funds Agape Community Center ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds VETERANS EMPOWERMENT ORGANIZATION OF GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSESINC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Family Resources ↗
- Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF DAWN INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Pan Asian Community Services ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S MERCY CARE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Drake House Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MOVING ON INC WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER TO END DV ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Atlanta Womens Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.