Skip to content
The Astraea Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Astraea Foundation Inc

The astraea lesbian foundation for justice, inc.

$5.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$5.5MHuman Services$1.2MEducation$923kHealth$875kCommunity Improvement$859kArts & Culture$771kHousing & Shelter$600kEnvironment$423kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $1,011,668, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,026,930 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,015,262 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $548k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $455k
$30,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING (TAKE)$90,000
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE (SVA)$90,000
SISTERREACH$60,000
HOUSE OF TULIP$60,000
HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE$55,000
FREEDOM OKLAHOMA$50,000
OPERATION RESTORATION$50,000
WECARE TN$45,000
THE I AM HUMAN FOUNDATION$40,000
HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE INC$40,000
ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC$33,334
HUMANITIES AMPED$30,000
LOUISIANA TRANS ADVOCATES$30,000
BLACK LGBTQIA MIGRANT PROJECT$30,000
PALMETTO STATE ABORTION FUND$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND: $20k → 15%EARTHLODGE CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATION INC: $70k → 14%YOUNG WOMEN UNITED: $50k → 14%TRANSSOCIAL INC: $70k → 15%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING (TAKE): $123k → 16%THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $105k → 33%OUR SPOT KC INC: $105k → 15%FREEDOM INC: $15k → 10%WECARE TN: $45k → 17%THE I AM HUMAN FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $10k → 9%STONEWALL YOUTH: $10k → 9%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $65k → 19%RAINBOW DEFENSE FUND: $15k → 15%BOLD FUTURES: $35k → 14%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING (TAKE): $90k → 16%MY SISTAH'S HOUSE: $20k → 33%FREEDOM INC: $15k → 10%WECARE TN: $30k → 17%THE I AM HUMAN FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%QUEER & TRANS PEOPLE OF COLOR BIRTHWERQ PROJECT (QTPOC BP): $10k → 9%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $30k → 19%MARIPOSAS SIN FRONTERAS: $15k → 15%BOLD FUTURES: $26k → 14%THE KNIGHTS AND ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $10k → 33%FREEDOM INC: $8k → 10%WECARE TN: $30k → 17%THE I AM HUMAN FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%TRANSCENDING WOMEN: $20k → 23%POWER INSIDE: $24k → 19%MARIPOSAS SIN FRONTERAS: $8k → 15%BOLD FUTURES: $22k → 14%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING (TAKE): $90k → 16%THE KNIGHTS AND ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $10k → 33%BOLD FUTURES: $15k → 14%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING: $90k → 16%THE KNIGHTS AND ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $8k → 33%MARYLAND SAFE HAVEN: $10k → 19%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVE: $30k → 19%ARIZONA COALITION TO END SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $35k → 11%BAY AREA AMERICAN INDIAN TWO SPIRITS: $10k → 10%SISTER SONG INC: $50k → 13%SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE: $25k → 13%SOMOS FAMILIA: $10k → 10%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 17%HOUSE LIVES MATTER: $20k → 17%HOUSE LIVES MATTER: $20k → 17%ROAD INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $4.0M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.0M · 26% · 31 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

South America$720k · 18% · 45 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Central America and the Caribbean$508k · 13% · 18 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

East Asia and the Pacific$476k · 12% · 17 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$337k · 8% · 23 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

South Asia$259k · 7% · 13 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Russia and Neighboring States$254k · 6% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Middle East and North Africa$201k · 5% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

North America (Canada and Mexico)$185k · 5% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Astraea Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Astraea Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 66 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
51

Total granted

$9.6M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

89%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +326%
  • GS
    Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network
    5× · 2018–2023 · $692k · revenue +26%
  • SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE
    6× · 2018–2025 · $527k · revenue ×15

Funded once

  • TV
    THE VAID GROUP
    one grant, 2019 · $154k
  • LV
    LGBTQ Victory Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $127k · revenue +60%
  • WI
    WILLIAMS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Queer Works

Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.

Health
3
National Trans Bar Association
Education
4
Queer Power Alliance

Queer Power Alliance is rooted in the LGBTQIA+ community and in solidarity with other marginalized communities. We strive for equity by disrupting systems of oppression holding back LGBTQIA+ communities through advocating, educating,…

Human Services
5
Forward Together Action

FORWARD TOGETHER ACTION (FTA) is an national reproductive justice organization that ORGANIZES COMMUNITIES who experience reproductive oppression TO BUILD POWER. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of colorAnd…

Human Services
6
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
7
Alliance to Mobilize Our Resistance

AMOR is an alliance of community based grassroots organizations mobilizing at the intersections of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and immigration status to prevent, to respond to, and to end state violence against our community.

Human Services
8
Lavender Rights Project

Lavender Rights Project elevates the power, autonomy, and leadership of the black intersex & gender diverse community through intersectional legal and social services. We utilize the law as an organizing principle to affirm our civil…

Crime & Legal
9
Global Philanthropy Project Inc

Global Philanthropy Project (GPP or the Organization) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex…

Philanthropy
10
Trans Women of Color Healing Project

The Trans Women of Color Healing Project mission is to combat the erasure of Trans peoples' lives, narratives, and contributions to society. We speak truth to power and also uplift the stories that center TWOC people, our families, our…

Human Services
11
African American Office of Gay Concerns

To comprehensively serve as a resource for the well-being of gay men of color, inclusive but not limited to gay, bisexual & transgender & questioning communities through outreach, education & care.

—
12
Translatina Network Inc

The mission of translatina network is to gain equal and lasting rights for all latina transgender women at a local, state and federal level. through the effective social mobilization of our community, we will have direct involvement in…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trans Queer Pueblo - Semilla De Liberacion; the most unlike its peers is Mariposas Rebeldes Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/108
Grantees still filing
69/108
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network: $692,000 · Civil RightsGenders & Sexualities Al…SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $375,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUN…Communities United for People: $188,000 · Civil RightsCommunities United for P…SPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW: $178,000 · Civil RightsSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTI…The Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice: $136,750 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center: $135,750 · Civil RightsBYP100 Education Fund: $133,750 · Civil RightsLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $126,999 · Civil Rights+19 more: $777,250 · Civil Rights+19 moreTransgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering: $392,500 · Human ServicesTransgender Advoca…OPERATION RESTORATION: $160,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RESTORAT…THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $153,000 · Human ServicesTHE KNIGHTS & ORCH…BOLD FUTURES NM: $148,125 · Human ServicesBOLD FUTURES NMBaltimore Safe Haven Corp: $135,000 · Human ServicesBaltimore Safe Hav…Wecaretn: $105,000 · Human ServicesOUR SPOT KC: $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesI Am Human Foundation: $80,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesMAYFAIRE MEDICAL INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesEarthlodge Center For TransformationInc: $70,000 · Human ServicesRestoring Lifeways: $70,000 · Human Services+12 more: $386,500 · Human Services+12 morePROJECT SOUTH INC: $235,000 · OtherPROJECT SOUTH INCNORTH STAR FUND INC: $168,000 · OtherTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $154,837 · OtherTHE VAID GROUP: $154,000 · OtherWILLIAMS INSTITUTE: $124,554 · OtherTRANS UNITED: $120,500 · OtherBLACK TRANSMEN INC: $115,500 · OtherWomen With A Vision: $155,000 · OtherST JAMES INFIRMARY: $123,250 · OtherTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC: $116,250 · OtherCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $130,750 · OtherPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT: $138,750 · Other+40 more: $1,607,796 · Other+40 moreSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,325,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND EN…Earth Guardians: $60,000 · Environment+3 more: $89,000 · Environment+3 moreFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $569,527 · EducationFRANKLIN &…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $257,410 · EducationUNIVERSITY…SISTERREACH: $175,000 · EducationSISTERREAC…INREACH: $60,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $56,000 · Education+1 more: $26,143 · EducationALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $272,334 · Arts & CultureMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $220,000 · Arts & CultureHUMANITIES AMPED: $220,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION: $93,750 · Arts & CultureACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom: $52,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $38,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $527,000 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthropy Inc: $280,000 · Public BenefitCommunity Movement Builders Inc: $70,000 · Public Benefit
Civil Rights$2,743,499Human Services$2,030,125Other$3,344,187Environment$1,474,000Education$1,144,080Arts & Culture$896,584Public Benefit$877,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,325,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGenders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network: $692,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $569,527 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE: $527,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetTransgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering: $392,500 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $375,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $280,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $272,334 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $257,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $235,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $220,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHUMANITIES AMPED: $220,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetCommunities United for People: $188,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW: $178,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetSISTERREACH: $175,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC: $168,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION: $160,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWomen With A Vision: $155,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $154,837 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $153,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM: $148,125 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT: $138,750 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice: $136,750 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $135,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBaltimore Safe Haven Corp: $135,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBYP100 Education Fund: $133,750 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $130,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLGBTQ Victory Institute Inc: $126,999 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetST JAMES INFIRMARY: $123,250 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC: $116,250 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHOUSE OF TULIP: $110,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetWecaretn: $105,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetOUR SPOT KC: $105,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetGIRLS FOR GENDER EQUITY INC: $98,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION: $93,750 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetZAMI NOBLA INC: $90,834 over 3y, 14% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $88,962 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTRANS QUEER PUEBLO - SEMILLA DE LIBERACION: $86,250 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $83,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetI Am Human Foundation: $80,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $74,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMAYFAIRE MEDICAL INC: $70,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetEarthlodge Center For TransformationInc: $70,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC: $70,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRestoring Lifeways: $70,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALIANZA TRANSLATINX: $65,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Borealis PhilanthropyProteus Fund IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Groundswell FundTides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncMs Foundation for Wom…Solidaire Network IncTides CenterWellspring Philanthro…Common Counsel Founda…Rockefeller Philanthr…
Borealis PhilanthropyMN111.9× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Proteus Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Groundswell Fund · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Solidaire Network Inc · Tides Center · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Astraea Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Astraea Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp: 28% of income from government
  • Out in the Open Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Astraea’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home