Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Arlington Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$1.9MHuman Services$975kEducation$500kHousing & Shelter$355kEmployment$300kFood & Nutrition$200kYouth Development$75kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $650k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$250,000
THE DANNON PROJECT$100,000
THREE HOTS AND A COT$100,000
THE BIRMINGHAM PROMISE$100,000
BREAKTHROUGH BIRMINGHAM$100,000
URBAN MINISTRY$100,000
HATCHING HOPE$50,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$50,000
COMMUNITY FOODBANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$50,000
THE JOEL FUND$25,000
MCKEMIE PLACE INC$25,000
RIGHT MOVES FOR YOUTH$25,000
THE LOT PROJECT$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $430k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FLOURISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%THE JOEL FUND: $25k → 8%RIGHT MOVES FOR YOUTH: $25k → 10%FLOURISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM: $15k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of The Arlington Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Arlington Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 10 repeat orgs$691k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$3.8M
$416k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+19%

Still filing today

90%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    Birmingham Promise Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +97%
  • MP
    McKemie Place Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +6%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • EL
    EAST LAKE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • 3H
    3 HOTS AND A COT
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • AC
    ATLANTA COMM FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Kitchens of Birmingham

Assistance to homeless and needy persons.

Food & Nutrition
2
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

3
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

4
Mom Community Inc

To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24

Human Services
5
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
6
Birmingham Cross Cultural Connections

The Mission of Birmingham Cross Cultural Connections is to alleviate the burdens on immigrant and refugee families entering the city of Birmingham through resources training assistance opportunities and relationships that encourage…

Human Services
7
Rebuilding Together Central Alabama

Bringing volunteers and communities together to improve the homes and lives of low-income homeowners.

Community Improvement
8
Hope Atlanta Inc

Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.

9
Kings Home Inc

Kings Home seeks to serve and glorify God by providing Christ-centered homes and services in which compassion and competence combine to meet the needs of women, children and families escaping domestic violence and other abusive conditions.

Human Services
10
United Community Ministries Inc

Providing food & shelter to the homeless and transitioning the homeless toward permanent independence in housing.

Human Services
11
The Collective Blueprint

Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.

Employment
12
Habitat for Humanity Williamson -Maury

Habitat for humanity of williamson-maury (hfhwm) seeks to put god's love into action by partnering with communites to build affordable housing, inspiring hope and life-changing stability for families through homeownership.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Redeeming Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROTHER BRYAN MISSION — $1,911,899 · Human ServicesBROTHER BRYAN MISSIONUrban Ministry Inc — $300,000 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry Inc+5 more — $150,000 · Human Services+5 moreIndividual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…3 HOTS AND A COT — $100,000 · Other3 HOTS AND A COTATLANTA COMM FOOD BANK — $50,000 · OtherATLANTA COMM FOOD …THE NEST — $50,000 · OtherTHE NESTTHE LOT PROJECT — $25,000 · Other+2 more — $16,012 · OtherBirmingham Promise Inc — $300,000 · EducationBirmingham P…BREAKTHROUGH BIRMINGHAM — $200,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH…EAST LAKE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterEAST LAKE…THREE HOTS & A COT — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterTHREE HOT…McKemie Place Inc — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterMcKemie P…HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD …BELOVED ASHEVILLE — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED A…DANNON PROJECT — $300,000 · Community ImprovementATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $50,000 · Food & NutritionHATCHING HOPE — $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$2,361,899Other$741,012Education$500,000Housing & Shelter$355,000Community Improvement$300,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROTHER BRYAN MISSION — $1,911,899 over 3y, 38% of budgetUrban Ministry Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetDANNON PROJECT — $300,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBirmingham Promise Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH BIRMINGHAM — $200,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetEAST LAKE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE HOTS & A COT — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMcKemie Place Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetFLOURISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOT PROJECT — $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetRight Moves for Youth Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetREDEEMING HOPE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $1,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Arlington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Arlington Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Arlington Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph