· Private foundation
The Anna Belle Kritser II Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $280k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| John Austin Cheley Foundation | $35,000 |
| Texas Tech University Health Scienc | $30,000 |
| Texas Tech University Davis College | $30,000 |
| Texas Tech University Health Scienc | $30,000 |
| Texas Tech University School Vet Me | $30,000 |
| West Texas AM University Foundation | $25,000 |
| West Texas AM University Foundation | $25,000 |
| Golden Spread Council of Boy Scouts | $25,000 |
| The Giving Plate | $20,000 |
| Amarillo Symphony Inc | $10,000 |
| Metro Ministries of Fort Worth | $10,000 |
| Mountainstar Family Relief | $10,000 |
| Polk Street United Methodist Church | $5,000 |
| Junior League of Amarillo | $5,000 |
| Panhandle Fellowship Christian Athl | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +14%
- YYOUTHCARE5× · 2017–2021 · $180k · revenue +23%
- ASAMARILLO SYMPHONY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- BIBETHLEHEM INNone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -28%
MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +67%- MPMCGILVRA PTA SEATTLE COUNCIL 6 15 237one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…
Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.
Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
To be the leading provider of excellent healthcare for the communities we serve.
To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.
The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The mission of the lone star conference is to foster student participation and success among member institutions in ncaa division ii intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of each institution's total educational program. it shall…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turn Center and the most unlike its peers is Mcgilvra Pta Seattle Council 6 15 237. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds METRO MINISTRIES OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AMARILLO ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL CENTER LEAGUE HOUSE OF AMARILLO TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds MCGILVRA PTA SEATTLE COUNCIL 6 15 237 ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ARM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MCMURRY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds STORYBRIDGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mays Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Oeschger Family Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mary E Bivins Foundation · The Legett Foundation · M K Brown Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Anna Belle Kritser II Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Anna Belle Kritser II Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Anna Belle Kritser II Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.