· Private foundation
The Angelo and Margaret Diponio Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of THE ANGELO AND MARGARET DIPONIO FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $500
- $10k–50k11 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC | $20,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES GREATER DETROIT | $20,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY ROYAL OAK | $10,000 |
| OUR HOME PANTRY GARDEN CITY | $10,000 |
| FORGOTTEN HARVEST | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE | $10,000 |
| LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $10,000 |
| THE ARC OF NORTHWEST WAYNE COUNTY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +37%
- SASALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +4%
- SCSCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +207%
Funded once
- THTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGANgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +28%
- HPHOME PANTRY IN GARDEN CITYone grant, 2020 · $16k
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MICHIGANone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
Creating healthy communities - together
Creating healthy communities - together
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…
To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.
Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Gleaners Community Food Bank of Southeastern Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds ANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC ↗
- Who funds SALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANN ARBOR COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER DETROIT ↗
- Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Madonna University ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF NORTHWEST WAYNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Helen L Kay Charitable Trust · Ford Philanthropy · Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Angelo and Margaret Diponio Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.