· Private foundation
Helen L Kay Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOODWILL IND OF GREATER DETROIT | $20,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF EAST BRADY | $20,000 |
| SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN | $20,000 |
| STARR COMMONWEALTH | $20,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $20,000 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| Hunter Hospitality House | $3,000 |
| ATHLETES FOR CHARITY | $3,000 |
| EPILEPSY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| GILDAS CLUB-METRO DETROIT | $3,000 |
| LIONS VISUALLY IMPAIRED YOUTH CAMP INC | $3,000 |
| ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $3,000 |
| PEWABIC SOCIETY INC | $3,000 |
| OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES | $3,000 |
| OIHN FBO HONOR COMMUNITY HEALTH | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $353k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +33%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER2× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +27%
- CCCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY3× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMY-EASTERN MICHIGANone grant, 2024 · $25k
- BABARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +27%
- MCMotor City Missionone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…
Creating healthy communities - together
Creating healthy communities - together
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.
The organization's mission is to support community-based, stakeholder driven training for care teams including physicians, care managers, care coordinators, medical assistants and behavioral health specialists; facilitate training and…
Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.
Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…
Creating healthy communities - together
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Capital Region Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Bottomless Toy Chest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE RAINBOW CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT LINK ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Kettering University ↗
- Who funds CAMP CASEY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THREE PILLARS AN EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER ↗
- Who funds DETROIT INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Little Heroes League ↗
- Who funds THE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends In Deed ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Carls Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Eagles for Children · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Young Woman's Home Association of Detroit Michigan · Deroy Testamentary Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Helen L Kay Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.