· Private foundation
The Andrew and Sheri Rosen Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $51,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $45,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS | $25,000 |
| BROADWAY DALLAS | $21,040 |
| VANDERBILT HILLEL | $11,042 |
| AT & T PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS | $10,000 |
| VOGEL ALCOVE | $10,000 |
| DALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER DALLAS | $5,000 |
| WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS | $5,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - PENN BOATHOUSE RENOVATION | $4,000 |
| HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $267k · revenue +224%
- CMCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +236%
- BDBroadway Dallas Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +225%
Funded once
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWMENTone grant, 2018 · $25k
- HNHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +58%
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…
Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.
The mission of the dallas va research corporation is to support scientific research, education, and rehabilitation to improve the lives of veterans and their families.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wise Tails - a Senior Dog Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Broadway Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK HIGH SCHOOL PTA ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS INTERNATIONAL THEATRICAL ARTS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DWIGHT MORROW HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THINK PINK ROCKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · The Rosewood Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Fichtenbaum Charitable Trust · Celanese Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Andrew and Sheri Rosen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Andrew and Sheri Rosen Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Andrew and Sheri Rosen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.