Skip to content
The Andrea W & Kenneth C Frazier Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Andrea W & Kenneth C Frazier Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$2.5MEducation$1.6MReligion$400kArts & Culture$385kCivil Rights$300kCrime & Legal$295kFood & Nutrition$180kScience & Tech$170kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k26 grants · $550k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.6M
$50,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$1,125,000
American Stroke Foundation$1,030,291
President & Fellows of Harvard College$1,000,000
President & Fellows of Harvard College$1,000,000
Concordance Academy (First Chance Campaign)$400,000
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc.$249,912
American Heart Association$100,000
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace$100,000
The Hun School$80,000
Studio Museum in Harlem$50,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$50,000
Temple University$50,000
Legal Services Corporation$50,000
Ellis Marsalis Center for Music Inc.$50,000
Philabundance$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%Thomas Jefferson University: $30k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$730k · 13 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$730k
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+12%

Still filing today

85%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Philabundance
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +41%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +18%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • JT
    JOURNEY TO LEAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -9%
  • TC
    The City Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +150%
  • JF
    JEFFERSON'S FERRY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
12
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is NORTH10 Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
28/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard Colle…+10 more: $440,395 · Education+10 moreMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $1,175,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterConcordance Academy (First Chance Campaign): $400,000 · OtherConcordance Academy (First Chance Campai…Philabundance: $100,000 · OtherJOURNEY TO LEAD INC: $100,000 · OtherCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: $100,000 · Other+21 more: $730,000 · Other+21 moreAMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION: $1,030,291 · Human ServicesAMERICAN STROKE FO…ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesELLIS MARSALIS CEN…+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesLEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $100,000 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $35,000 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY: $25,000 · Crime & LegalSupport Center for Child Advocates: $25,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $249,912 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $75,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $110,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $50,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $30,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 · Health
Education$2,440,395Other$2,605,000Human Services$1,155,291Crime & Legal$315,000Civil Rights$299,912Arts & Culture$235,000Health$205,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $249,912 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $110,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOURNEY TO LEAD INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $80,395 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Bar Association: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe City School: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJEFFERSON'S FERRY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPRO BONO INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCFDA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH10 PHILADELPHIA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAREMESSAGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRENTON TRACK CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetADAM TALIAFERRO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetChinese Family Camp Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…Independence Foundati…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Sidley Austin Fou…The Pew Charitable Tr…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Robert Wood Johns…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Jewish Communal FundSilicon Valley Commun…
The William Penn FoundationPA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Sidley Austin Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Andrea W & Kenneth C Frazier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Andrea W & Kenneth C Frazier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andrea W & Kenneth C Frazier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home