Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$248k
Granted FY2021
27
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

55% of The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Blackbaud Giving Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 12 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $248k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’20
8
’21
6
’22
7
’23
12
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.2MArts & Culture$255kEducation$143kEnvironment$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$104kFood & Nutrition$99kCommunity Improvement$72kHuman Services$53kOther$0
02FY2021 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k12 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $215k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way - Greater Toledo$25,000
United Way - Greater Toledo$25,000
Toledo Alliance for Performing Arts$25,000
Toledo Alliance for Performing Arts$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
National Center for Water Quality$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Nutrients For Life Foundation$10,000
The Nature Conservancy - Ohio$10,000
Junior Achievement - Toledo$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
American Red Cross - Greater Toledo Area Chapter$10,000
United Way - Greater Toledo$10,000
Local Initiatives Support Corp (LISC)$10,000
Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $40k → 11%American Red Cross-Cleveland: $10k → 17%American Red Cross- Washington DC: $5k → 14%Old Newsboys Goodfellow Association: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NV
IA
IN
OH
NE
MO
VA
NC
SC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 39% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 37%.

The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$767k · 20 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$767k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+73%

Still filing today

45%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $175k · revenue +19%
  • FE
    FERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +66%
  • TO
    THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $35k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AR
    American Red Cross - Toledo
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • KC
    Kansas City Community Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NM
    National Multiple Sclerosis Society - Ohio
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
4
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
5
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
6
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
7
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
8
National Farmers Union Foundation

The national farmers union foundation's (nfuf) mission is to empower people to educate our youth, neighbors, media and policymakers on the social, economic and cooperative contributions of family agriculture.

Food & Nutrition
9
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
10
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
11
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
12
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $995,300 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUNDUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $115,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO+2 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNational Center for Water Quality: $60,000 · OtherNational Center for Water Quali…United Way - Greater Toledo: $60,000 · OtherUnited Way - Greater ToledoIndividual grant recipient: $45,540 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Nature Conservancy - Ohio: $40,000 · OtherThe Nature Conservancy - OhioAmerican Red Cross-Greater Toledo Area Chapter: $30,000 · Other+38 more: $291,171 · Other+38 moreTOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $175,000 · Arts & CultureTOLEDO AL…FERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION: $54,000 · EducationTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $35,000 · EducationHeidelberg University: $15,000 · EducationBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesOLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $40,000 · Community ImprovementSandusky County Agricultural Society: $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $318 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$1,120,300Other$600,711Arts & Culture$175,000Education$111,000Human Services$57,500Community Improvement$40,000Food & Nutrition$25,318

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $995,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $175,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO: $115,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSandusky County Agricultural Society: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAY DETROIT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL ADVANCE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $318 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $318 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
  • Who funds FERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds Sandusky County Agricultural Society ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
  • Who funds SAY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Thaman Family Foundation Ica · Andersons Foundation · George Isaac Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Andersons Inc Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andersons’ filings →

    More from the funding graph