Skip to content
The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$634k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $305k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$3,600
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHERS FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION$250,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION$155,125
THE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE$100,000
ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION$50,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$18,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$18,000
SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
MUSEUM AT ELDRIDGE STREET$10,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA$5,000
DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC$3,600
PROJECT ALS INC$1,800
SHALVA$1,800
THE BIG HOUSE FOUNDATION$1,800
FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW$1,800
THE BRIDGE GOLF FOUNDATION INC$1,800
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5k → 14%FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW: $2k → 14%SHALVA: $2k → 17%ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION: $50k → 14%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA INC: $1k → 10%THE BIG HOUSE FOUNDATION: $2k → 23%BROTHERS FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION: $250k → 9%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $18k → 17%DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION: $155k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $18k → 17%UNIVERSAL KINDNESS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%THE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $100k → 17%THE OXALOSIS & HYPEROXALURIA FOUNDATION CO: $2k → 17%THE BRIDGE GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 17%PROJECT ALS INC: $2k → 17%SAMUEL WAXMAN CANCER RESEARCH: $10k → 17%MUSEUM AT ELDRIDGE STREET: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
3
Friends of the Jewish Museum Berlin

To promote and financially support the activities of the jewish museum berlin and similar institutions whose mission is to pursue the study of the history and culture of german-speaking jewry.

Education
4
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
6
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation

The Mt. Sinai Health Foundation improves the health of Greater Cleveland by investing resources, convening, and collaborating - with a focus on: - Equitable health outcomes- Health of the Jewish community- Academic medicine and bioscience…

Health
12
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel On Campus Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bridge Golf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
3/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROTHERS FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION INC: $250,000 · OtherBROTHERS FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION INCTHE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $100,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE+4 more: $15,400 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $155,125 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERAT…+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $50,000 · EducationCentral Fund of Israel: $18,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $18,000 · InternationalMUSEUM AT ELDRIDGE STREET: $10,000 · EnvironmentDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $3,600 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC: $1,800 · HealthThe Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation: $1,800 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BIG HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · Arts & Culture
Other$365,400Philanthropy$157,125Education$50,000International$36,000Environment$10,000Health$8,200Arts & Culture$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $155,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM AT ELDRIDGE STREET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIG HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSAL KINDNESS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alyssa & Clifford Greenberg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home