Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$438kArts & Culture$106kHealth$41kHuman Services$34kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$778k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$15,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$10,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION$10,000
MAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS$10,000
WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$5,000
CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT$5,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC$5,000
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION$3,000
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO$3,000
CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT$2,500
THE HISTORYMAKERS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
RI
CA
MO
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Alvin Marley Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$568k · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$568k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+16%

Still filing today

86%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +10%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $118k · revenue +162%
  • BE
    BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BU
    BROWN UNIVERSITY - BROWN ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • JA
    JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $124,600 · EducationTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONIndiana University Foundation: $118,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationUniversity of Chicago: $12,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT: $77,500 · OtherCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY …YMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS: $28,500 · OtherYMCA OF THE FOOTHILLSMAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS: $28,000 · OtherMAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE …WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $17,500 · OtherWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $11,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHIC…+3 more: $7,000 · OtherBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $85,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK ENSEMBLE THEA…THE HISTORYMAKERS: $20,500 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTORYMAKERSBROWN UNIVERSITY: $40,500 · Community ImprovementChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $38,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 · HealthNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesJack and Jill of America Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$256,600Other$169,500Arts & Culture$105,500Community Improvement$40,500Health$40,500Civil Rights$6,000Human Services$4,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $124,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $118,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $85,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT: $77,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $40,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS: $28,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HISTORYMAKERS: $20,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJack and Jill of America Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS ↗
  • Who funds THE HISTORYMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN DEBATE COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pasadena Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pasadena Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Western Asset Management Company Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alvin Marley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph