Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$438kArts & Culture$106kHealth$41kHuman Services$34kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$778k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$15,000
MAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS$10,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION$10,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$10,000
CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT$5,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$5,000
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC$5,000
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,000
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$3,000
BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION$3,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO$3,000
THE HISTORYMAKERS$2,500
CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER CALTECH JPL COMMUNITY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
RI
CA
MO
MD
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Alvin Marley Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$568k · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$568k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+16%

Still filing today

86%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +10%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $118k · revenue +162%
  • BE
    BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BU
    BROWN UNIVERSITY - BROWN ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • JA
    JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $124,600 · EducationTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONIndiana University Foundation — $118,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationUniversity of Chicago — $12,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT — $77,500 · OtherCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY …YMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS — $28,500 · OtherYMCA OF THE FOOTHILLSMAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS — $28,000 · OtherMAYFIELD JUNIOR SCHOOL OF THE …WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $17,500 · OtherWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO — $11,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHIC…+3 more — $7,000 · OtherBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION — $85,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK ENSEMBLE THEA…THE HISTORYMAKERS — $20,500 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTORYMAKERSBROWN UNIVERSITY — $40,500 · Community ImprovementChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $38,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 · HealthNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $5,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $1,000 · Civil RightsCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $4,000 · Human ServicesJack and Jill of America Foundation Inc — $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$256,600Other$169,500Arts & Culture$105,500Community Improvement$40,500Health$40,500Civil Rights$6,000Human Services$4,000Youth Development$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $124,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $118,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION — $85,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT — $77,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $40,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS — $28,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HISTORYMAKERS — $20,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO — $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJack and Jill of America Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION
  • Who funds CONSORTIUM FOR GRADUATE STUDY IN MANAGEMENT
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS
  • Who funds THE HISTORYMAKERS
  • Who funds WESTRIDGE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds CHILD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN DEBATE COMMISSION
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
  • Who funds Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pasadena Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pasadena Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Western Asset Management Company Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alvin Marley Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph