Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$288kEducation$102kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$6kInternational$5kEnvironment$4kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESH$11,400
BAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$11,000
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR$8,300
KEREN UFORATZTO INC$5,000
CONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH$4,500
NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE$4,100
YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH$4,000
NAT'L CONFERENCE OF SYNAGOGUE YOUTH$3,300
CONGREGATION DERECH CHAIM INC$2,000
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE$1,630
MENUCHA INC$1,500
WOMEN'S INSTITUTE OF TORAH$1,500
SHEARITH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$1,310
KHAL AHAVAS YISROEL TZEMACH TZEDEK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%MENUCHA INC: $2k → 11%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $250 → 19%MENUCHA INC: $500 → 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$418k · 28 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$418k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +4%
  • SH
    SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • MI
    Menucha Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • OU
    ORTHODOX UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • YI
    YOUNG ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD BEACH
    one grant, 2023 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
3
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
4
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Kehilla Kedosha Inc

TO FOCUS ON JEWISH EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY AND to engage with the Almighty by means of passionate prayer, to delve into the inner dimensions of the Torah, and to grow in ones relationship with Hashem.

Religion
8
Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok Inc
—
9
Community Kollel of Northeast Phila Inc

The Northeast Community Kollel was established to be a center for full time advanced Torah study in the Rhawnhurst section of Northeast Philadelphia and seeks to engage and inspire every Jew, regardless of education, observance or…

Religion
10
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
11
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
12
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Baltimore Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $93,860 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC: $85,360 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INCCONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH INC: $29,600 · OtherCONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH INCNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC: $21,500 · OtherNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCCONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESH: $21,500 · OtherCONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESHAGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE INC: $11,920 · Other+23 more: $91,335 · Other+23 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $42,200 · InternationalAMERICAN F…SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $20,000 · HealthJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $7,500 · EducationKeren Uforatzto Inc: $5,000 · ReligionMESORAH BALTIMORE INC: $1,500 · ReligionMenucha Inc: $3,500 · Human ServicesThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc: $250 · Human ServicesRABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$355,075International$42,200Health$20,000Education$7,500Religion$6,500Human Services$3,750Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $42,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWELS SCHOOL INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMenucha Inc: $3,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH BALTIMORE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKol Koreh Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWELS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Keren Uforatzto Inc ↗
  • Who funds Menucha Inc ↗
  • Who funds RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Kol Koreh Inc ↗
  • Who funds RABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Center for Jewish Education Inc · Crane Family Foundation Inc · The Hackerman Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Volosov Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Preservation & Perpetuation of Torah Laws & Customs · The Adar Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Alvin and Hanna Gerstein Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jewels School Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alvin & Rose Berlin’s filings →

More from the funding graph