Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$288kEducation$102kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$6kInternational$5kEnvironment$4kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESH$11,400
BAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$11,000
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR$8,300
KEREN UFORATZTO INC$5,000
CONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH$4,500
NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE$4,100
YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH$4,000
NAT'L CONFERENCE OF SYNAGOGUE YOUTH$3,300
CONGREGATION DERECH CHAIM INC$2,000
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE$1,630
MENUCHA INC$1,500
WOMEN'S INSTITUTE OF TORAH$1,500
SHEARITH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$1,310
NER TAMID GREENPRING VLY SYNANOGUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%MENUCHA INC: $2k → 11%SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $250 → 19%MENUCHA INC: $500 → 11%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$418k · 28 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$418k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +4%
  • SH
    SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • MI
    Menucha Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • OU
    ORTHODOX UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • YI
    YOUNG ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD BEACH
    one grant, 2023 · $600

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

2
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
3
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
4
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Kehilla Kedosha Inc

TO FOCUS ON JEWISH EDUCATION AND SPIRITUALITY AND to engage with the Almighty by means of passionate prayer, to delve into the inner dimensions of the Torah, and to grow in ones relationship with Hashem.

Religion
8
Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok Inc
9
Community Kollel of Northeast Phila Inc

The Northeast Community Kollel was established to be a center for full time advanced Torah study in the Rhawnhurst section of Northeast Philadelphia and seeks to engage and inspire every Jew, regardless of education, observance or…

Religion
10
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
11
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
12
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%9%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr20%13%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%3%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr20%3%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr12%39%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
3,320/27,033

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $93,860 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC — $85,360 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INCCONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH INC — $29,600 · OtherCONGREGATION SHOMREI EMUNAH INCNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC — $21,500 · OtherNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCCONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESH — $21,500 · OtherCONGREG SHOMREI MISHMERES HAKODESHAGUDATH ISRAEL OF BALTIMORE INC — $11,920 · Other+23 more — $91,335 · Other+23 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $42,200 · InternationalAMERICAN F…SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $20,000 · HealthJEWELS SCHOOL INC — $7,500 · EducationKeren Uforatzto Inc — $5,000 · ReligionMESORAH BALTIMORE INC — $1,500 · ReligionMenucha Inc — $3,500 · Human ServicesThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc — $250 · Human ServicesRABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$355,075International$42,200Health$20,000Education$7,500Religion$6,500Human Services$3,750Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $42,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWELS SCHOOL INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMenucha Inc — $3,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC — $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH BALTIMORE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKol Koreh Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds JEWELS SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Keren Uforatzto Inc
  • Who funds Menucha Inc
  • Who funds RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC
  • Who funds MESORAH BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds RABBI JOSEPH BREUER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Kol Koreh Inc
  • Who funds The Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Center for Jewish Education Inc · Crane Family Foundation Inc · The Hackerman Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Volosov Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Preservation & Perpetuation of Torah Laws & Customs · The Adar Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Alvin and Hanna Gerstein Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Jewels School Inc2% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph