Skip to content
The Alpert Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Alpert Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$495kInternational$302kHealth$123kRecreation & Sports$95kCivil Rights$89kEducation$69kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,846
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC$2,846
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%EAST END HOSPICE: $1k → 7%UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $5k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOC OF NORTH AMERICA: $3k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
41

Total granted

$1.0M
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+15%

Still filing today

93%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $469k · revenue +46%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $213k · revenue +73%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $89k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • BU
    BROWN UNIVERSITY SPORTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • SH
    SAG HARBOR CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC CO SUSAN MEAD
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Settlement Society of New York; the most unlike its peers is Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $468,713 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PH…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $12,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC: $212,846 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $68,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATI…AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $13,500 · International+2 more: $1,000 · InternationalBU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50,000 · OtherBU SCHOOL OF MEDICI…BROWN UNIVERSITY SPORTS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY SP…Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $10,000 · OtherCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherAIPR: $10,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $10,000 · OtherSAG HARBOR CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC CO SUSAN MEAD: $10,000 · OtherPREP FOR PREP: $10,000 · Other+27 more: $51,955 · Other+27 moreAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $89,300 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsROW NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30,000 · HealthTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Health+2 more: $1,500 · HealthBROWN UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$505,713International$295,346Other$221,955Civil Rights$89,300Recreation & Sports$70,000Health$60,000Community Improvement$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $468,713 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC: $212,846 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $89,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $68,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAG HARBOR CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC CO SUSAN MEAD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFOOTSTEPS INC: $6,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST AND HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLD OAKS FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH PREP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CONNECTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON A RICH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEHAMPTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATROLMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHAMPTON TOWN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundAmerican Express Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Renaissance Charitabl…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…
Jewish Communal FundNY19.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · American Express Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alpert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alpert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Alpert Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Alpert Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alpert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home