Loading…
· Private foundation
THE ALMA GLICKMAN FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$5k
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
4
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of THE ALMA GLICKMAN FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
artsanta
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$111k
Total assets
Largest grants
- CANCER FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO$2,000
- MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION$600
- THE AFRICAN DREAM ACADEMY FOUNDATIO$500
- SANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
- PHOTOGRAPHY COLLECTIONS PRESERVATIO$500
- YOUTHWORKS$250
- SAINT JOHN HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$250
- COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$150
- EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL$100
- CARING BRIDGE$50
- SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$50
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17k · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
14
Total granted
$17k
$5k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+68%
+44%
Still filing today
67%
29%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Civil RightsPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY5× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +10%
- YYOUTHWORKS3× · 2022–2024 · $850 · revenue +68%
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES3× · 2022–2024 · $750 · revenue +126%
Funded once
- RRRELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +12231%
- JFJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LAone grant, 2019 · $500
- SFSANTA FE CIVITANone grant, 2019 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
—
2
New Mexico Casa Association Inc
To strengthen, support, and unify Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Programs at the local, state, and national level, who advocate for children involved in any children's court proceeding.
Philanthropy
3
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Civil Rights
4
Casa Fortaleza
Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.
Health
5
La Casa Inc
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
—
6
First Judicial District Casa-Gal Program
The mission of casa (court appointed special advocates) is to provide volunteer guardians to work on behalf of abused and neglected children to promote their best interests in the pursuit of safe, permanent homes.we envision a world in…
Crime & Legal
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of
Purpose of casa is to advocate for the best interest of the vulnerable children in foster care. these children have been removed from their homes due to a substantiated case of abuse and neglect.
Crime & Legal
8
New Mexico Coalition Against
The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.
—
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates
To provide trained community volunteers, to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, and to promote community awareness about child abuse issues.
Civil Rights
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of
The purpose of casa is to help obtain safe, permanent homes for abused and neglected children in out-of-home placements as quickly as possible. the organizations provides court-appointed volunteers to advocate for permanent homes for…
Crime & Legal
11
The Santa Fe Opera
To foster and enrich an understanding and appreciation of the operatic art form.
Arts & Culture
12
Santa Fe Recovery Center Inc
Santa fe recovery center works with individuals to sustain lasting recovery from substance abuse disorders and related mental health disorders by providing culturally proficient, evidence-based treatment and education in partnership with…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youthworks and the most unlike its peers is Case Art Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$21,170Health$1,500Youth Development$850Civil Rights$850Philanthropy$600Human Services$100Education$100
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASE ART FUND ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTHWORKS ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE ALMA GLICKMAN FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CASE ART FUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 823195241 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CASE ART FUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Alma Glickman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Alma Glickman Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines