Skip to content
The Allemall Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Allemall Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$259kEnvironment$173kReligion$102kInternational$55kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kAnimals$27kHealth$26kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CONSERVATION FILM FESTIVAL$2,500
FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$1,500
CLARK UNIVERSITY$1,500
RIDE ALLEGHENY$1,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MCDANIEL COLLEGE$500
WISE RIVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%VILLAGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 11%VILLAGE OF HOPE INC: $11k → 11%VILLAGE OF HOPE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MA
PA
CA
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 32 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
39

Total granted

$565k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+14%

Still filing today

25%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FK
    Florida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k · revenue +144%
  • FU
    FONKOZE USA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +59%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS PARISH CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
The Center for Conservation Biology

Mission statement: our mission is to provide the global community with the information needed to drive thoughtful, science-based conservation, to educate and train the next generation of conservation scientists, and to make lasting…

Environment
3
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
4
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
12
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teller Wildlife Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Widecast Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
10/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYAKISHENYI AFRICAN MISSION: $67,200 · OtherNYAKISHENYI AFRICAN MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $41,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANAI INC: $37,000 · OtherANAI INCST JOHNS PARISH CHURCH: $29,000 · OtherST JOHNS PARISH CHURCHUPWELL: $27,000 · OtherUPWELLIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,500 · Other+59 more: $234,740 · Other+59 moreTELLER WILDLIFE REFUGE INC: $30,000 · AnimalsFlorida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc: $13,000 · AnimalsTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $8,500 · AnimalsWIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc: $3,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN CONSERVATION FILM FESTIVAL INC: $46,550 · Arts & CultureFriends of Gualala River: $45,000 · EnvironmentThe Village of Hope Inc: $33,585 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesFONKOZE USA INC: $7,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $7,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 · HealthUNIFIED COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $600 · Health
Other$497,440Animals$54,500Arts & Culture$46,550Environment$45,000Human Services$43,585International$14,000Health$7,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION FILM FESTIVAL INC: $46,550 over 7y, 13% of budgetFriends of Gualala River: $45,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetANAI INC: $37,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetThe Village of Hope Inc: $33,585 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTELLER WILDLIFE REFUGE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFlorida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONKOZE USA INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMATURE RESOURCES FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SHEPHERDSTOWN CHARITABLE FUND INC: $2,850 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSHEPHERDSTOWN COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $2,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIFIED COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSED BRIDGES INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREDERICK CO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATION FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Gualala River ↗
  • Who funds ANAI INC ↗
  • Who funds The Village of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds TELLER WILDLIFE REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FONKOZE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nora Roberts Foundati…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Nora Roberts FoundationMD13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nora Roberts Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Allemall Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Allemall Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allemall’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home