· Private foundation
The Ajram Family Foundation Gaby a Ajram
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $275k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+8 grants · $8.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANERA | $3,500,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $1,000,000 |
| WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA | $1,000,000 |
| HEART FOR LEBANON | $750,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| UNICEF | $500,000 |
| THE CARTER CENTER | $500,000 |
| ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN SUPPORT FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $200,000 |
| WORLD RELIEF | $150,000 |
| WORLD VISION | $100,000 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE INIITIATIVE | $100,000 |
| BETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| MEDGLOBAL INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $603k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID8× · 2017–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +161%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +98%- TCTHE CARTER CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +38%
Funded once
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +36%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $25k
- SRSPANISH RIVER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…
The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…
The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…
The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED ↗
- Who funds Christians Reaching Out To Society Inc ↗
- Who funds EBENEZER GLENN ORPHANAGE ↗
- Who funds UOSSM USA ↗
- Who funds THE GLADES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds HEROES CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HAITI PASTOR TRAINING MISSION ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds FARMWORKER COORDINATING COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE GUATEMALAN-MAYA CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Palm Beach Post Season to Share Inc · Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc · Extraordinary Charities Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Quantum Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ajram Family Foundation Gaby a Ajram funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.