Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aigner Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$469kHealth$105kReligion$66kEducation$61kYouth Development$26kEmployment$25kCommunity Improvement$20kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $76k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE FUND SEED MONEY$25,000
REFUGE FOR WOMEN$15,600
CONCORDIA PLACE$15,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$10,000
CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING$10,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$7,628
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS$5,000
MOSAIC NATIONAL SUPPORTS$2,000
BETSY'S BLANKETS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONCORDIA PLACE: $15k → 14%BETSY'S BLANKETS: $1k → 14%BETSY'S BLANKETS: $20k → 14%BETSY'S BLANKETS: $15k → 14%BETSY'S BLANKETS: $8k → 14%BETSY'S BLANKETS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 8 repeat orgs$300k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$527k
$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+27%

Still filing today

63%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +94%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +70%
  • BB
    BETSY'S BLANKETS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +134% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • EL
    EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHRUCH IN AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • AC
    AUGUSTANA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Start Early

Start early advances quality early learning for families with children, before birth through their earliest years, to help close the opportunity gap.

—
2
Lutheran Services in America Incorporated

Lutheran services in america mission: cultivate caring communities that advance health and opportunity for all by building valuable connections, amplifying our voices and empowering our members in their mission to answer god's call to love…

Religion
3
Human Services Research Institute Inc

To provide research and technical assistance in the fields of intellectual and developmental disabilities, population health, substance use and prevention, mental health and child and family services.

Social Science
4
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
5
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
6
Association House of Chicago

Association house's mission is to advance each person's full participation in the life of their families, communities, and society. since 1899, we have served a vibrant, multicultural community. we used a trauma informed, culturally…

Human Services
7
Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill

Founded in 1883, brightpoint (formerly known as children's home & aid) is a leading statewide organization supporting families so children can thrive.

Human Services
8
Center for Employment Opportunities Inc

We provide effective employment services to individuals recently released from incarceration.

Employment
9
Easter Seals Hawaii

Easterseals hawaii (esh) is creating a more equitable world so people with developmental disabilities can choose their path. we do this by reimagining how care and support can be better connected to fill gaps in human services across an…

Health
10
Centerstone of Illinois Inc

Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"

Health
11
Cardinal Services Inc of Indiana

The mission of cardinal services, inc. of indiana is to assist and advocate for people with disabilities and challenges to live lives full of dignity, growth, and opportunity.

Education
12
The Hope School

The hope learning academy serves children with intellectual/developmental disabilities and neurological disorders and their families by providing homes in which to grow, schools in which to learn, clinics in which to become healthier,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Illinois; the most unlike its peers is Betsy's Blankets. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $324,500 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISEASTER SEALS INC: $69,340 · OtherEASTER SEALS INCTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $59,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INCEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHRUCH IN AMERICA: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $25,000 · OtherEMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE FUND SEED MONEY: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $120,323 · Other+17 moreBETSY'S BLANKETS: $45,000 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA PLACE: $15,000 · Human ServicesVETSVETERANS EXPLORING TREATMENT SOLUTIONS: $25,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $20,000 · HealthAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE TIES INC NFP: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $10,171 · InternationalNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$658,663Human Services$60,000Health$45,000Education$25,000Youth Development$17,500International$10,171Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $324,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $69,340 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $59,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBETSY'S BLANKETS: $45,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetVETSVETERANS EXPLORING TREATMENT SOLUTIONS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA PLACE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISTRICT 214 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,255 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $10,171 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOSAIC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOSA - SAFE FROM ONLINE SEX ABUSE INC: $1,035 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds BETSY'S BLANKETS ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VETSVETERANS EXPLORING TREATMENT SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA PLACE ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT 214 EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE TIES INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC ↗
  • Who funds SOSA - SAFE FROM ONLINE SEX ABUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aigner Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aigner Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Aigner Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Aigner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aigner’s filings →

More from the funding graph