Skip to content

· Private foundation

The a & a Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$540k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$830kEducation$295kArts & Culture$285kCivil Rights$265kHealth$160kFood & Nutrition$145kEnvironment$85kInternational$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY$150,000
YALE UNIVERSITY (LEX HIXON ARCHIVE FUND)$40,000
MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES$35,000
TOMORROW'S LEADERS NYC$30,000
TIDES CENTER KAIROS CENTER POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN$25,000
DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC$25,000
URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC$25,000
ECHOING GREEN INC$25,000
SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION$20,000
DION'S CHICAGO DREAM INC$20,000
NY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP GRASSROOTS GROCERY$20,000
COLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC$20,000
NATIVE RENEWABLES INC$20,000
SMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONS$20,000
BRIDGE BOSTON FOUNDATION INC BRIDGE BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $20k → 16%COLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC: $20k → 16%FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS INC: $20k → 10%D-REV DESIGN: $20k → 10%URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $25k → 14%DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN INC: $25k → 17%TOMORROW'S LEADERS NYC: $30k → 20%UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $50k → 14%DION'S CHICAGO DREAM: $20k → 14%NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $20k → 16%COLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC: $20k → 16%FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS INC: $20k → 10%EQUALIZE HEALTH (FORMERLY D-REV DESIGN): $20k → 10%URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS: $20k → 14%DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN INC: $20k → 17%TOMORROW'S LEADERS NYC: $20k → 20%UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $25k → 14%DION'S CHICAGO DREAM INC: $20k → 14%NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $20k → 16%BRIDGE BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOL: $20k → 16%TIDES CENTER KAIROS CENTER POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN: $25k → 10%URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS: $20k → 14%DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN INC: $20k → 17%UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $25k → 14%DION'S CHICAGO DREAM: $20k → 14%BRIDGE BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOL: $20k → 16%SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN INC: $20k → 17%UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $20k → 14%BRIDGE BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOL: $20k → 16%SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%DUNGKAR GONPA SOCIETY: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN INC: $20k → 17%SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $25k → 17%SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONS: $20k → 14%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $20k → 17%SMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONS: $20k → 14%SMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONS: $20k → 14%MUSLIMS FOR PRGRESSIVE VALUES THE MARKAZ: $40k → 14%MUSLIMS FOR PRGRESSIVE VALUES THE MARKAZ: $40k → 14%MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES: $35k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
AZ
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 23 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$2.1M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-2%

Still filing today

61%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +32%
  • SA
    SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +79%
  • UA
    URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • HC
    HALEAKALA CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • DD
    D-REV DESIGN
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • EH
    Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
2
Institute for New Global Politics Inc

The Institute for New Global Politics is a California-based educational nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. It is an independent and nonpartisan thinktank dedicated to educating the general…

International
3
Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation or global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—
4
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
7
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
8
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
Greenwood Project

Greenwood's mission is to create career pathways in the financial services industry for black and latino college students. we partner with companies to find equitable and inclusive solutions for recruitment, retention, and advancement. our…

Human Services
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spirit Awakening Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUNGKAR GOMPA SOCIETY INC: $750,000 · OtherDUNGKAR GOMPA SOCIETY INCUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $120,000 · OtherUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYMUSLIMS FOR PRGRESSIVE VALUES THE MARKAZ: $110,000 · OtherMUSLIMS FOR PRGRESSIVE VALUES THE MARKAZSMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONS: $100,000 · OtherSMART BEGINNINGS EASY PREVENTIONSBRIDGE BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherNY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP GRASSROOTS GROCERY: $60,000 · Other+13 more: $345,000 · Other+13 moreDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $105,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NO…NATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE RENEW…From The Heart Productions: $40,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Hea…KIMOKEO FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureKIMOKEO FOUN…HAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAIIAN MIS…TRICYCLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentTomorrows Leaders NYC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentECHOING GREEN INC: $105,000 · EducationTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $25,000 · EducationTREE ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationINTEGRATION CHARTER SCHOOLS: $5,400 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationDIONS CHICAGO DREAM INC NFP: $60,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $65,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCOLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC: $40,000 · Employment
Other$1,560,000Arts & Culture$255,000Youth Development$165,000Education$150,400Food & Nutrition$85,000Public Safety & Disaster$65,000Employment$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTomorrows Leaders NYC: $65,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDIONS CHICAGO DREAM INC NFP: $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES: $35,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHALEAKALA CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKIMOKEO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL DIGNITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetGLOBAL ACTION TO PREVENT WAR AND ARMED CONFLICT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetTREE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRICYCLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRATION CHARTER SCHOOLS: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT AWAKENING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tomorrows Leaders NYC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE RENEWABLES INC ↗
  • Who funds DIONS CHICAGO DREAM INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds HALEAKALA CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GARRISON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds KIMOKEO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ACTION TO PREVENT WAR AND ARMED CONFLICT INC ↗
  • Who funds TREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TRICYCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATION CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Echoing Green IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Echoing Green Inc · California Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The a & a Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The a & a Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • College for Social Innovation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The a & a Fund?

Find your warmest path to The a & a Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on a & a’s filings →

More from the funding graph