Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$149kEducation$131kHuman Services$67kHealth$40kReligion$14kArts & Culture$8kInternational$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$495k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION$20,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$16,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$6,000
MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION$5,000
NAMI METRO BALTIMORE$3,000
HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM$3,000
BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
HO'OLA NA PUA$1,000
LEVINDALE AUXILIARY$1,000
HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MD FUND FOR MEDICINE$1,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$1,000
SHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $2k → 7%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $6k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $4k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $4k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $3k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $3k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $3k → 11%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $20k → 19%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $3k → 11%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $3k → 11%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $2k → 11%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $2k → 11%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM: $2k → 11%BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%LIVING CLASSROOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%NAMI METRO BALTIMORE: $3k → 19%NAMI METRO BALTIMORE: $3k → 19%NAMI METRO BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $7k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $6k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $5k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $5k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 70% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$388k · 17 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$388k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+37%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +28%
  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $96k · revenue +27%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • HS
    HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SI
    Shoresh Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • GH
    GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

2
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

3
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

4
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
5
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

6
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
8
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
9
University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical System Inc

The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…

10
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Baltimore Washington Healthcare Services Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.

12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mosaic Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shoresh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $96,250 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INCMY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 · PhilanthropyMY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION INCTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BAL…BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION …HAR SINAI - OHEB SHALOM CONGREGATION INC — $10,000 · OtherHAR SINAI …HOUSE OF RUTH — $7,500 · OtherHOUSE OF R…UNIVERSITY OF MD FUND FOR MEDICINE — $7,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…HAR SINAI-OHEB SHALOM — $1,500 · OtherALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC — $4,000 · OtherALVIN S MI…MOSAIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,000 · Other+8 more — $6,000 · Other+8 moreNAMI METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INC — $10,500 · HealthLEVINDALE AUXILIARY INC — $7,000 · HealthSHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $7,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor — $27,500 · ReligionHO'OLA NA PUA — $7,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · International
Philanthropy$181,250Education$130,000Other$38,000Health$30,000Religion$27,500Human Services$7,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $96,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor — $27,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INC — $10,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLEVINDALE AUXILIARY INC — $7,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOSAIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShoresh Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds MY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor
  • Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NAMI METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds LEVINDALE AUXILIARY INC
  • Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA
  • Who funds SHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
  • Who funds ALVIN S MINTZES HATZALAH OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds MOSAIC COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Shoresh Inc
  • Who funds GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC
  • Who funds STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Crane Family Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · America's Charities · Johns Hopkins University · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Living Classrooms Foundation7% of income from government
  • Mosaic Community Services Inc4% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc2% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc1% of income from government
  • Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc0% of income from government
  • Sheppard Pratt Health System Inc0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inc?

Find your warmest path to The a a Windesheim Charitable Found Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph