Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 1916 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.9MPhilanthropy$925kEducation$320kEnvironment$115kCommunity Improvement$50kHealth$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$43,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$750,000
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$350,000
WESTMINSTER ABBEY$333,333
THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$50,000
Individual grant recipient$43,000
TATNALL SCHOOL$40,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$25,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 76% of grant dollars ($3.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($931k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $750k → 10%MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $62k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $350k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $80k → 22%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN BIG CITIZEN HUB: $50k → 14%THE SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $250k → 13%KANAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $20k → 6%DELAWARE THEATER COMPANY: $50k → 10%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $225k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%THE SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $125k → 13%KANAN FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25k → 10%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $200k → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%TATNALL SCHOOL: $40k → 10%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $186k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $100k → 16%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $50k → 16%THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $50k → 16%THE TRUSTTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $15k → 16%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 24% of all-years giving ($931k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$806k · 7 grants
Canada$125k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of The 1916 Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The 1916 Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 6 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$2.4M
$342k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+11%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +38%
  • SF
    SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $375k · revenue +262%
  • TK
    THE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $150k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $62k · revenue +77%
  • DT
    DELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
4
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
5
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
6
Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc

The mission of the princeton symphony orchestra is to leverage the power of live music to uplift the human experience.

Arts & Culture
7
Balletx

Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
9
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
10
Wmht Educational Telecommunications Inc

Wmht enriches communities and elevates diverse perspectives by providing content, connection, and conversation that advance education, culture, and civic engagement.

—
11
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $925,000 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCSHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $375,000 · PhilanthropySHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATIONBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,061,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $62,000 · Arts & CultureDELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWESTMINSTER ABBEY: $533,333 · OtherWESTMINSTER ABBEYTHE ROYAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $179,900 · OtherTHE ROYAL PHILHARMONIC ORCHES…THE SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherTHE SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ROYAL PHILHARMONIC: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN BIG CITIZEN HUB: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · Other+2 more: $45,000 · OtherTHE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationTHE KENAN…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $130,000 · EducationTRUSTEES …THE TATNALL SCHOOL INC: $40,000 · EducationTHE TATNA…THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $115,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,300,000Arts & Culture$1,178,000Other$1,026,233Education$320,000Environment$115,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,061,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $925,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $375,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetTHE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $62,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE TATNALL SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 1916 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 1916 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Delaware Community Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Delaware Theatre Company: 8% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Tatnall School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The 1916 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The 1916 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 1916’s filings →

More from the funding graph