Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thanks Oklahoma Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$3.6MHealth$2.4MHousing & Shelter$1.6MFood & Nutrition$1.3MPhilanthropy$820kRecreation & Sports$200kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $355k
  • $250k+2 grants · $900k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL OK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500,000
MERCY$400,000
UNITED WAY$120,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$75,000
CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE$60,000
TEEM$50,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$50,000
ST BJ'S PANTRY FOR THE HOMELESS$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $70k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $60k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $60k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $25k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $25k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $35k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.9M · 15 repeat orgs$650k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$9.9M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+33%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $520k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +63% · 50% of their budget
  • CO
    CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +36%
  • TC
    The Center of Family Love
    8× · 2018–2025 · $390k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • EA
    ENERGY ASSIST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
2
Family Safety Center Inc

The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…

Crime & Legal
3
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
4
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
5
Urban League of Greater Oklahoma City Inc

The urban league of greater oklahoma city's (ulokc) mission is to assist african americans, other minorities, and the poor to achieve social and economic equality. its core mission is focused on education and economic mobility through…

Human Services
6
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
7
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Center for Housing Solutions Inc

Create a community where homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring through strong public/private partnerships, using data to guide our strategy, and educate the public on homelessness and its solutions.

—
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
11
The Homeless Families Foundation

The homeless families foundation educates and nurtures children while empowering families to achieve stable housing and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Oklahoma Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $3,575,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INCMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,600,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OK: $950,000 · OtherREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OK: $500,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKTEEM: $450,000 · OtherTEEMMERCY: $400,000 · Other+5 more: $521,000 · Other+5 moreCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,575,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL OKLAHOMA…The Center of Family Love: $390,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $200,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $150,000 · Food & NutritionFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 · HealthBUTTERFIELD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health
Other$7,996,000Housing & Shelter$1,575,000Human Services$460,000Philanthropy$200,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Health$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $3,575,000 over 8y, 50% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,575,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $390,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTERFIELD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center of Family Love ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY ASSIST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUTTERFIELD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Love Meyer Family FoundationOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Love Meyer Family Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Servant Foundation · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thanks Oklahoma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thanks Oklahoma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thanks Oklahoma Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Thanks Oklahoma Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thanks Oklahoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph