Skip to content
Texoma Medical Center Volunteers at a glance

· Public charity

Texoma Medical Center Volunteers

Undertake activities that promote health and health related education of individuals residing in north Texas and southern Oklahoma and collaborate with hospital to provide assistance to departments (non-revenue producing) in their functions and delivery of patient care.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$213kHealth$150kFood & Nutrition$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kHousing & Shelter$48kHuman Services$34kYouth Development$29kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $134,832, the rows itemized in this filing. The $138,472 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,640 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$961k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAYSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$26,000
SHARE MINISTRIES INC$20,540
CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER$20,000
PVES FOUNDATION INC$15,000
HOUSE OF ELI$15,000
TEXAS ASSN OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS$13,000
BARNABAS CENTER$9,600
DENISON SOUP KITCHEN$5,692
WOMEN ROCK$5,000
CIVIL AIR PATROL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $6k → 11%HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT ACTION TEAM: $6k → 11%DENISON SOUP KITCHEN: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$557k · 9 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$557k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-4%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $152k · revenue +177%
  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +33%
  • TA
    TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $61k · revenue +199% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • GC
    GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -4%
  • GC
    GRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue -30%
  • HH
    HOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Garrison Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Grayson County Welfare Board Inc

To provide for children in the custody of the Texas Department of Regulatory Services.

Human Services
3
Casa of Grayson County Inc

CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of Grayson County is a non-profit organization dedicated to training and equipping our community to protect children, empower families, and advocate for positive outcomes for children involved in…

Civil Rights
4
Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force

To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.

Crime & Legal
5
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
6
Grayson Grand Central Station

The mission of Grand Central Station is to help reduce the effects of limited resources for those in need, by providing a soup kitchen, a choice food pantry, and children's meal packages for the weekends during the school year. GCS also…

Food & Nutrition
7
Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

—
8
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
9
Denison Service League

The denison service league is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

Community Improvement
10
East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalition

End homelessness in East Texas, & Community Collaboration

Human Services
11
Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana

Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance

Human Services
12
Smith County Help Center Inc

Assist residents and transients of Smith County with basic needs, including food, clothing, and emergency utility assistance

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texoma Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Locust Community Volunteer Fire Dep. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $80,000 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENT…TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS: $61,000 · HealthTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCAR…WOMEN ROCK INC: $37,877 · HealthWOMEN ROCK INC+1 more: $6,000 · HealthGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $152,000 · EducationGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FO…FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $32,500 · OtherFANNIN COUNTY CHILDREN…GRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION: $13,500 · OtherGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENIL…HOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $10,000 · OtherHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSO…LOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP: $10,000 · OtherLOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUN…BARNABAS CENTER: $9,600 · OtherBARNABAS CENTERKIDS PANTRY: $7,500 · OtherKIDS PANTRYSURRENDER HOUSE FOR MEN INC: $5,000 · OtherTRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $20,000 · OtherTRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTR…DENISON HELPING HANDS: $5,000 · OtherGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $15,000 · OtherGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRE…DENISON ANIMAL WELFARE GROUP DAWG: $5,000 · OtherSHARE MINISTRIES INC: $70,540 · ReligionSHARE MINIST…VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL OF TEXOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,234 · ReligionVOLUNTEER SE…PVES FOUNDATION INC: $57,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPVES FOUND…CIVIL AIR PATROL INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCIVIL AIR …HOUSE OF ELI INC: $45,720 · Housing & ShelterGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesTexoma Family Shelter: $6,256 · Human ServicesHOMELESS EMPOWERMENT ACTION TEAM: $6,205 · Human ServicesDENISON SOUP KITCHEN: $5,692 · Human Services
Health$184,877Education$152,000Other$133,100Religion$77,774Public Safety & Disaster$62,000Housing & Shelter$45,720Human Services$28,153

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $152,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $80,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetSHARE MINISTRIES INC: $70,540 over 4y, 20% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS: $61,000 over 7y, 63% of budgetPVES FOUNDATION INC: $57,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetHOUSE OF ELI INC: $45,720 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetWOMEN ROCK INC: $37,877 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION: $13,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetTexoma Family Shelter: $6,256 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDENISON SOUP KITCHEN: $5,692 over 1y, 28% of budgetDENISON HELPING HANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDENISON ANIMAL WELFARE GROUP DAWG: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCIVIL AIR PATROL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texoma Community Foun…United Way of Grayson…Clara B & W Aubrey Sm…Texas Instruments Fou…Sherman Service LeagueWilson N Jones Commun…Elias & Hanna Regensb…The Oliver Dewey Mayo…Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce …W B Munson Foundation…Communities Foundatio…Dorset Foundation Inc…
Texoma Community FoundationTX28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texoma Community Foundation · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Texas Instruments Foundation · Sherman Service League · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texoma Medical Center Volunteers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texoma Medical Center Volunteers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texoma Medical Center Volunteers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home