Skip to content
Texas Youth Development Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Texas Youth Development Corporation

Benefits tax exempt organizations that assist indigent, ill &troubled youth.

$110k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Human Services$235kHealth$38kEducation$25kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$5k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $90,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $110,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$42,500
DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER$20,000
YMCA OF HOUSTON$10,000
BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION$10,000
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS$7,500
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 9 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$295k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $128k · revenue +42%
  • DC
    DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +13%
  • BI
    BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +74%
  • SA
    SCOUTING AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • BK
    BE KIND SAN ANTONIO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
2
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
3
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
4
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
5
Stepping Stones Charter Elementary

Open enrollment public charter elementary school - grades pre-k through 8th

Education
6
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
7
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
8
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
Fort Worth Academy for the Education of Children and Youth

Education of children and youth

Education
11
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Be Kind San Antonio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $127,500 · OtherACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS: $10,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXASSCOUTING AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $60,000 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTERYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $30,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of t…CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $17,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH …BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthBELIEVE IT FO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…KEYSTONE SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationStar Sponsorship Program Inc: $5,000 · EducationMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBE KIND SAN ANTONIO INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$145,000Human Services$107,500Health$37,500Education$15,000Arts & Culture$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $127,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $17,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEYSTONE SCHOOL: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCOUTING AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStar Sponsorship Program Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBE KIND SAN ANTONIO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Elizabeth Huth Coates…San Antonio Area Foun…The Ayco Charitable F…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Nancy Smith Hurd FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · San Antonio Area Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Youth Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Youth Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Texas Youth Development Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Texas Youth Development Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $118k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texas Youth Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home