Skip to content

· Private foundation

Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$621k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$785kEducation$525kRecreation & Sports$150kReligion$98kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT FOUNDATION$250,000
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$125,000
RIVERHILL FOUNDATION$100,000
ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION$50,000
FCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$36,000
SMILE-A-MILE$25,000
THE ALLIANCE$20,000
CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY: $125k → 8%ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%FLORENCE-LAUDERDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100k → 13%EVANGEL ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $10k → 16%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50k → 15%UT FOUNDATION: $250k → 12%EVANGEL CHURCH DURHAM: $13k → 11%LUTZIE 43 FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY: $50k → 8%ALABAMA KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $30k → 7%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST ALABAMA: $55k → 13%CAMP SMILE A MILE: $50k → 16%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $15k → 15%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50k → 15%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION: $350k → 13%CAMP SMILE A MILE: $35k → 16%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $15k → 15%FCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $50k → 15%RIVERHILL FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%SMILE-A-MILE: $25k → 16%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $15k → 15%FCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $36k → 15%THE ALLIANCE: $20k → 13%SMILE-A-MILE: $25k → 16%ASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $15k → 15%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES - UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $25k → 15%SMILE-A-MILE: $25k → 16%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES - UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $25k → 15%CAMP SMILE A MILE: $20k → 16%CAMP SMILE A MILE: $20k → 16%FCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$721k · 6 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$721k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SMILE-A-MILE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +24%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $185k · revenue 0%
  • FU
    FCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $111k

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue -38%
  • FP
    FLORENCE-LAUDERDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breast Cancer Research Foundation of Ala

To help find a cure for breast cancer by funding promising breast cancer research in alabama and to raise community awareness and funding for that research.

Health
2
Alabama Oncology Foundation

None

Health
3
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
4
CancerFree Kids

CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…

Health
5
Montgomery Cancer Wellness Foundation

To provide supportive services, educational services, and assistance to cancer patients throughout central alabama, including those patients who lack the resources

Health
6
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
7
Urology Health Foundation

The Urology Health Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2003 by Birmingham urologist Dr. Thomas E. Moody. Its purposes are to educate physicians and other medical professionals in new techniques and procedures being…

Education
8
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
9
Texas Neurofibromatosis Foundation

To fund neurofibromatosis research and education and to provide for support groups for those facing the illness.

Health
10
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
11
The Lupus Foundation of America Heartland Chapter Inc

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for all people affected by lupus through programs of research, education, support, and advocacy.

—
12
United Way of Cullman County Inc

to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities through promoting the collection and responsible distribution of charitable funds

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of North Alabama Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lutzie 43 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONUT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherUT FOUNDATIONNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $185,000 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCFCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $111,000 · OtherFCA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAFLORENCE-LAUDERDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100,000 · OtherFLORENCE-LAUDERDALE PUBLIC LIBRARYRIVERHILL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherRIVERHILL FOUNDATION INCASSEMBLIES OF GOD WORLD MISSION: $75,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES - UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $42,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION: $350,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORT…LUTZIE 43 FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationLUTZIE 43 FOUNDATI…SMILE-A-MILE: $220,000 · HealthSMILE-A-MILEAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc: $80,000 · HealthAlabama Kidney …CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthUnited Way of Northwest Alabama: $55,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,463,500Education$370,000Health$315,000Philanthropy$55,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $220,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $185,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERHILL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTZIE 43 FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERHILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Northwest Alabama ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds LUTZIE 43 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kingdom Alliance FoundationAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kingdom Alliance Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Terry and Susan Anderson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph