Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kingdom Alliance Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$438k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$1.7MEducation$661kHealth$321kPhilanthropy$209kInternational$92kCommunity Improvement$33kHuman Services$27kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $207k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$107,000
B CHARITABLE INC$100,000
BARNABAS & PARTNERS$30,000
FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
GRACE TO YOU$20,000
REDEEMER CITY TO CITY$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DEPT OF NEUROLOGY$20,000
CAST FOR KIDS$15,000
ONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRY$12,000
WELLSPOKEN MINISTRIES$12,000
SMILE-A-MILE$10,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL AT OAK MOUNTAIN$8,669
4 MARKET SQUARE FELLOWS$7,500
FAITH COMES BY HEARING$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLERESTORY INC: $5k → 16%CLERESTORY INC: $5k → 16%CLERESTORY INC: $5k → 16%CLERESTORY INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 31 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$2.9M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

52%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    B Charitable Inc
    2× · 2022–2025 · $185k · revenue +156%
  • RC
    Redeemer City To City
    7× · 2019–2025 · $170k · revenue +191%
  • OC
    ONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • RI
    RE-ENTRY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue -18%
  • CA
    Christian Assistance Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -30%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Good News Publishers

Crossway is a not-for-profit Christian publishing ministry of Good News Publishers that exists to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through publishing and other means, in order, by God's grace: to bring people to Christ as their Lord and…

3
Far Reaching Ministries

Far Reaching Ministries (FRM) was founded to carry the Gospel Jesus Christ to the world with discipleship as our primary objective. We plant and edify evangelical churches, found Bible schools, gather intimate small groups, and sustain…

International
4
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
5
Bible Thinker Inc

Bible Thinker, Inc is a ministry dedicated to equipping people to think and live biblically. There are three main areas of teaching that we focus on:1. Teaching accurate theology based on exegeting the text of the Bible and confronting…

Religion
6
Up Global Inc

UP Global exists to make Jesus known where He is not yet known. We provide pathways of engagement to the unreached and unengaged people in the world.

International
7
Grace Bible Fellowship of Antioch

Grace Bible Fellowship of Antioch is dedicated to winning this world for Christ through the preaching of the undiluted word of God and exemplary actions that glorify Christ.

Religion
8
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
9
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
10
Thru the Bible Inc

The organization produces a 26-minute bible study program that takes the listener through the entire bible in 5 years. the bible study programs air in over 250 languages and dialects and are heard in more than 190 countries, to bring the…

Religion
11
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
12
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paul Tripp Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Tolson Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Cancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsJewish Community FederationsUnited Way FederationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%7%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr12%33%35–55yr17%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr12%60%35–55yr17%0%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
14%
3,157/22,746

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

URBAN HOPE — $780,000 · OtherURBAN HOPEOAK MOUNTAIN CHURCH — $533,669 · OtherOAK MOUNTAIN CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DEPT OF NEUROLOGY — $212,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DEPT OF NEUROLOGYONE FOR ISRAEL — $80,000 · OtherGRACE TO YOU — $70,000 · OtherCHINA PARTNERSHIP — $70,000 · Other+17 more — $237,400 · Other+17 moreBarnabas & Partners — $180,000 · ReligionBarnabas & PartnersRedeemer City To City — $170,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To CityONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRIES — $114,900 · ReligionONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRIE…WELLSPOKEN MINISTRIES — $83,000 · ReligionWELLSPOKEN MINISTRIES4 MARKET SQUARE INC — $28,500 · Religion+7 more — $51,000 · Religion+7 moreB Charitable Inc — $185,000 · PhilanthropyB Charitab…SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · PhilanthropySHEPHERD C…+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyURBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENT — $74,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $21,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc — $10,500 · HealthSMILE-A-MILE — $10,000 · HealthCLERESTORY INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated — $12,114 · International
Other$1,983,569Religion$627,400Philanthropy$272,000Education$105,000Health$20,500Human Services$17,500International$12,114

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetB Charitable Inc — $185,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetBarnabas & Partners — $180,000 over 7y, 37% of budgetRedeemer City To City — $170,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRIES — $114,900 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetWELLSPOKEN MINISTRIES — $83,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetURBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENT — $74,000 over 5y, 19% of budget4 MARKET SQUARE INC — $28,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC — $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRE-ENTRY INC — $21,800 over 1y, 13% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLERESTORY INC — $17,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetOne For Israel — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $12,114 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc — $10,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetELISABETH ELLIOT FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetChristian Assistance Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOLSON GROUP — $6,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FATHER'S BUSINESS INC — $5,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPAUL TRIPP MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPrecept — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEHOLD ISRAEL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds B Charitable Inc
  • Who funds Barnabas & Partners
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City
  • Who funds ONWARD CAMPUS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WELLSPOKEN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds URBAN HOPE DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds 4 MARKET SQUARE INC
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds RE-ENTRY INC
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLERESTORY INC
  • Who funds One For Israel
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ELISABETH ELLIOT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Christian Assistance Foundation
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Ligonier Ministries Inc
  • Who funds THE TOLSON GROUP
  • Who funds THE FATHER'S BUSINESS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Long Lewis FoundationAL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Long Lewis Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · Terry and Susan Anderson Family Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kingdom Alliance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kingdom Alliance Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kingdom Alliance Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph