Skip to content

· Private foundation

Terry & Frances Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$54kEducation$47kArts & Culture$41kReligion$13kHealth$12kPhilanthropy$9kHuman Services$8kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$840k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW PRAIRIE LITTLE LEAGUE$14,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PORTER STARKE FOUNDATION$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONY$1,550
GREAT LAKES ELEMENTARY PTO$1,000
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY$1,000
LOGAN CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
UNITY FOUNDATION$250
NEW CARLISLE LIONS CLUB$250
ISLAND CC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$200
GRAVEL LAKE ASSOCIATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOBER OF ENTERTAINMENT: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 29 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
21

Total granted

$203k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+30%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    New Prairie Little League Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue -28%
  • RR
    RAXLAC RUMELYAC CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $22k
  • LC
    LAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • LP
    LAPORTE PARK AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • S
    SAFEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +311%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Chicago Blend Group Inc

Creating a more inclusive venture capital and entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Community Improvement
4
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Lakeland Christian School Inc

The mission of lakeland christian school is to educate students in the light of god's word to equip them for a lifetime of learning, leadership, service and worship.

Education
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
10
Firelight Foundation

Firelight supports catalytic community-based organizations in eastern and southern africa that work with their own communities to realize shared visions of sustainable change and true potential for children and youth.

International
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAXLAC RUMELYAC CENTER: $21,760 · OtherRAXLAC RUMELYAC CENTERLAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONY: $17,770 · OtherLAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONYST MARY'S OF THE WOODS: $16,075 · OtherST MARY'S OF THE WOODSIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAPORTE PARK AND RECREATION: $10,000 · OtherLAPORTE PARK AND RECREATIONWILLS TWP BAPTIST CEMETARY: $10,000 · OtherWILLS TWP BAPTIST CEMETARYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPORTER STARKE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,683 · OtherOAKLAWN FOUNDATION: $7,250 · Other+34 more: $36,745 · Other+34 moreNew Prairie Little League Inc: $43,000 · Recreation & SportsNew Prairie Little Le…LA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC: $12,750 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationSAFE: $2,500 · InternationalMAKARIOS: $1,250 · InternationalSober AF Entertainment Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS & CLAYS FOUNDATION: $300 · Health
Other$166,283Recreation & Sports$43,000Education$12,950International$3,750Human Services$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Prairie Little League Inc: $43,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetLA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC: $12,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS & CLAYS FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChapters Health Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD TAMPA BAY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS IN THE PARK LTD: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Prairie Little League Inc ↗
  • Who funds LA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Logan Community Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE ↗
  • Who funds MAKARIOS ↗
  • Who funds Sober AF Entertainment Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Healthcare Foundation of la Porte IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terry & Frances Jones Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terry & Frances Jones Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Terry & Frances Jones Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph