Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tengelsen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$920k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$476k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MHealth$1.3MFood & Nutrition$153kRecreation & Sports$81kCommunity Improvement$75kYouth Development$68kEnvironment$45kEmployment$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $313k
  • $250k+1 grant · $476k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$475,875
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$200,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$112,500
WOLCOT SCHOOL$43,000
NAMI CHICAGO$20,500
PILOT LIGHT$20,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$15,000
MT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$10,000
LEO HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CHICAGO YACHT CLUB$2,500
THE COLLECTIVE$1,816
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$1,000
UNLV FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $18k → 10%ALL STARS PROJECT: $25k → 17%SARETT NATURE CENTER: $15k → 15%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $260k → 8%SALUDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $25k → 9%PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $15k → 10%BLACKHAWKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%PILOT LIGHT: $20k → 14%PILOT LIGHT: $20k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $25k → 14%WOLCOTT SCHOOL: $48k → 14%WOLCOTT COLLEGE PREPARTORY SCHOOL: $43k → 14%WOLCOT SCHOOL: $43k → 14%WOLCOTT COLLEGE PREPARTORY SCHOOL: $43k → 14%WOLCOTT SCHOOL: $43k → 14%WOLCOTT COLLEGE PREP: $43k → 14%WOLCOTT COLLEGE PREP: $43k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $476k → 14%CONTEXTOS CHICAGO: $25k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $25k → 14%CONTEXTOS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $21k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $200k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $200k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $200k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $200k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $200k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $101k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $50k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $15k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $15k → 14%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $15k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $36k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $25k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $23k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $567k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $476k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $365k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $265k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $113k → 14%BIG SHOULDERS FUND: $100k → 14%VILLAGE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $55k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $25k → 14%THE DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION: $23k → 14%LOYOLA ACADEMY: $24k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $27k → 14%NAMI CHICAGO: $19k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT CHICAGO: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
CO
VA
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 32 repeat orgs$512k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
31

Total granted

$4.8M
$495k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+24%

Still filing today

53%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +67%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +33%
  • NC
    NAMI Chicago
    9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +551%

Funded once

  • KS
    KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $260k · revenue +61%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • SF
    SALUDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
2
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
3
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
4
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
5
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
6
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Students Run Chicago
Health
9
High Jump

High jump is a tuition free, two-year enrichment program for talented and motivated middle school students with limited family income. the students attend classes for a five week session during the summers before 7th and 8th grade; as well…

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
12
The Family Institute

Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After School Matters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cotopaxi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Big Shoulders Fund: $2,397,880 · EducationBig Shoulders FundKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 · EducationKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $134,000 · Education+7 more: $58,058 · EducationRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $1,211,100 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of…PILOT LIGHT: $59,700 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthNAMI Chicago: $207,354 · OtherNAMI ChicagoWOLCOTT COLLEGE PREP: $86,000 · OtherWOLCOTT COLLEGE PREPWOLCOTT COLLEGE PREPARTORY SCHOOL: $86,000 · OtherWOLCOTT COLLEGE PREP…VILLAGE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $75,000 · OtherVILLAGE LEADERSHIP A…MT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL: $54,210 · OtherMT CARMEL HIGH SCHOO…ALL STARS PROJECT CHICAGO: $40,200 · Other+45 more: $408,389 · Other+45 moreBig Green: $102,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,500 · Food & NutritionDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $38,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentALL STARS PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,849,938Health$1,280,800Other$957,153Food & Nutrition$103,500Philanthropy$38,500Youth Development$33,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $2,397,880 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $1,211,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $207,354 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $134,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBig Green: $102,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPILOT LIGHT: $59,700 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $38,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $30,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $20,525 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSARETT NATURE CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GAPLES INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE CARDIOLOGY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGREENWOOD PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCONTEXTOS NFP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI Sonoma County: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOTOPAXI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $3,537 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $2,533 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENDERSON COUNTY HUNGER COALITION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetErikson Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY OF PROVIDENCE: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKazma Family Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Big Green ↗
  • Who funds PILOT LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SARETT NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BEACON ACADEMY A MONTESSORI HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Purple Asparagus ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE GAPLES INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE CARDIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CONTEXTOS NFP ↗
  • Who funds LINK Unlimited Scholars ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL23.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Albert Pick Jr Fund · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Builders Vision Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tengelsen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tengelsen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tengelsen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tengelsen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tengelsen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph