Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tellumind Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$70kInternational$58kEnvironment$48kHuman Services$38kEducation$33kEmployment$29kYouth Development$12kCivil Rights$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$321k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FARESTART$7,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS SEATTLE$7,000
OREGON HARBOR OF HOPE$6,000
GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS$5,000
SOUTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST DO$5,000
SECOND WIND DREAMS$5,000
ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSINTL$3,000
CONSERVATION NORTHWEST$2,000
MIDCOAST SAILING CENTER SKFF YOUTH$2,000
TRANSITIONS PROJECT$1,500
WORLDREADER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CLIMATE SOLUTIONS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND WIND DREAMS: $5k → 13%OREGON HARBOR OF HOPE: $6k → 12%OREGON HARBOR OF HOPE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 19 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$323k
$11k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CONSERVATION NW
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +66%
  • AU
    ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • GP
    GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • SV
    SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • BL
    Bybee Lakes Hope Center
    3× · 2023–2025 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Progress Fund

Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…

Philanthropy
2
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
3
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
4
Sustainable Path Foundation

Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.

Social Science
5
Clean Energy Transition Institute

The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.

Education
6
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
7
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
8
Water for South Sudan Inc

Water for South Sudan delivers direct, transformative and sustainable quality-of-life service to the people of South Sudan by efficiently providing access to clean, safe water and improving hygiene practices in areas of great need.

International
9
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
10
Veap Inc

VEAP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, multi-service, human service organization with the mission of "Together, we create pathways to stronger, more hopeful, communities through access to healthy food, housing stability and supportive services."

—
11
Bio Ventures for Global Health

BVGH drives sustainable, market-informed solutions to improve access to quality healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. BVGH builds cross-sector partnerships that align industry, government, and local health-system priorities to…

Health
12
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social Venture Partners; the most unlike its peers is Ministry of Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $59,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMPLIO: $16,000 · OtherAMPLIOWORLDREADER: $15,000 · OtherWORLDREADERCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $11,000 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONSSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $10,000 · OtherSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSSOUTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $9,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & S…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSINTL: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherPongo Publishing Inc: $11,000 · OtherPongo Publishing IncMINISTRY OF HOPE INC: $6,000 · Other+5 more: $12,500 · Other+5 moreSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $40,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PA…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PA…CONSERVATION NW: $37,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION…ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · InternationalASHESI UNI…FARESTART: $29,000 · EmploymentFARESTARTGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $15,000 · HealthOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $7,000 · Human ServicesSECOND WIND DREAMS INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$164,500Philanthropy$52,000Environment$37,000International$30,000Employment$29,000Health$15,000Human Services$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $40,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW: $37,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART: $29,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetPongo Publishing Inc: $11,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMINISTRY OF HOPE INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTransition Projects Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
  • Who funds ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Pongo Publishing Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND WIND DREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Impactassetsinc · Ridge Road Foundation · Medina Foundation · Gates Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tellumind Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tellumind Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Transition Projects Inc: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tellumind’s filings →

More from the funding graph