· Private foundation
TTEC Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATION | $5,200 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND | $3,000 |
| DELTONA MIDDLE SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| NOMI NETWORK | $3,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| LEGACY OF HOPE CENTER INCORPRATED | $3,000 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MIS | $3,000 |
| FOSTER CHANGE | $3,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI | $3,000 |
| GOWAN SCIENCE ACADEMY PTO | $3,000 |
| HOPE HOMES INTERNATIONAL | $3,000 |
| FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC | $3,000 |
| EAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER | $3,000 |
| Charleroi Area El Ctr | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNational Merit Scholarship Corporation6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +34%
- EEEAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +46%
- FVFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER3× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- VFVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×45
- NUNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INCone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -65%
- TBTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.
The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as responsible, caring, and productive citizens.
Youth & opportunity united, inc. is a not-for-profit, youth development agency that provides services and leadership to meet the emerging needs of young people and their families in our community. y.o.u. programs are trauma-informed,…
Boys & girls clubs of middle tennessee's ("bgcmt") mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens. in essence, we seek to save and…
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is the nation's premier mentoring organization. The Organization's vision is that all children achieve success in life. The Organization's mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and…
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
To help children reach their potential through professionally supported one-to-one relationships with measurable impact.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Ukrainians of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Colorado Succeeds ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND MORGANTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO ↗
- Who funds MONONGALIA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Foster Change ↗
- Who funds DENVER JUNIOR GOLF ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc ↗
- Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY PREP INC ↗
- Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HBCU FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Dacula High School Band Booster Club Inc ↗
- Who funds GOING GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds THE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds OSBORN SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Forvis Mazars Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization TTEC Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to TTEC Foundation?
Find your warmest path to TTEC Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.