· Private foundation
Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Salvation Army Harbor House | $8,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Whetstone Boys Ranch | $6,000 |
| Child Advocacy Center | $5,000 |
| Children's Smile Center | $5,000 |
| Care to Learn | $5,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of The Ozarks | $5,000 |
| Foundation for Springfield Public Schools | $4,426 |
| PPS Foundation for Women in Need | $4,300 |
| Good Samaritan Boys Ranch | $4,200 |
| Praise Assembly of God | $4,000 |
| Pathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks | $3,700 |
| Ozarks Counseling Center | $3,000 |
| Shiloh Summer Camp Inc | $3,000 |
| Hope Counseling Center | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2024–2025 · $18k
- OCOzarks Counseling Center2× · 2024–2025 · $8k
- GSGood Samaritan Boys Ranch2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue -5%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2024 · $13k
- DRDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INCone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need
Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…
To render constructive civic service, including the sponsorship of social, educational, and economic projects for the promotion of the welfare of the community and the citizens of the ozarks situated in baxter, boone, marion, newton,…
To provide substance abuse counceling and services
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.
The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.
The mission of ozarks community health center is to provide greater access to quality, compassionate, and professional healthcare through our comprehensive health system and community partnerships.
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…
To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.
To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.
To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, evidence-based, trauma-informed, quality behavioral healthcare solutions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Violence Center and the most unlike its peers is Silver Dollar City Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc ↗
- Who funds Good Samaritan Boys Ranch ↗
- Who funds WHETSTONE BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC ↗
- Who funds PPS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN IN NEED ↗
- Who funds SHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds Care to Learn ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Springfield Public Schools ↗
- Who funds Pathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Faith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
- Who funds OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Cook Family Foundation · Stephen & Helen G Sedora Charitable Trust · Musgrave Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust · Bee Payne-Stewart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.