Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
6
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Telluride Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $229k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
8
18
1
19
3
20
3
21
1
22
0
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$740kArts & Culture$502kPhilanthropy$208kFood & Nutrition$115kHealth$90kHuman Services$70kEducation$34kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$846k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOTRE DAME - DPAC$50,000
MARTIN RICHARD FOUNDATION$50,000
LARC$50,000
TELLURIDE FOUNDATION$35,000
WASHINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL$25,000
EDDIE'S HOUSE$5,000
AFS-USA INC$5,000
JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION$5,000
PREP FOR PREP$2,500
CONNECTICUT WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC: $50k → 9%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%LARC: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$609k · 7 repeat orgs$806k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$609k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+99%

Still filing today

86%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +25%
  • EH
    EDDIES HOUSE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue ×37
  • TJ
    THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • FW
    FARM & WILDERNESS ROAD
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • TT
    THE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +99%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rodel Institute

The rodel institute is a nonpartisan center for leadership and intellectual growth. rodel helps america's most promising leaders reach their full potential as public servants, deepen their commitment to democracy and the rule of law,…

Philanthropy
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
4
Explorer West an Independent Middle School

We empower young people to explore and grow their unique intellectual, ethical, and creative capabilities, and to treasure diversity and growth in others.

Education
5
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Lowell School

Lowell school (the school) provides educational services to approximately 314 students in grades pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. the school strives to create a diverse, equitable, and inclusive learning environment, and offers a…

Education
8
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
9
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
10
The Walden School Inc

The walden school engages in the education of preschool through 5th grade children using a montessori based philosophy.

Education
11
The Field School Inc

Students discover their authentic selves and distinctive paths to become empathetic, creative thinkers who act boldly to shape our shared future. see schedule o

12
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Montessori Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Edible Schoolyard Project dba the Alice Waters Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATIONAL FILM PRESERVE LTD — $500,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL FILM PRESERVE LTDNOTRE DAME - DPAC — $350,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME - DPACFARM & WILDERNESS ROAD — $100,000 · OtherFARM & WILDERNESS ROAD+8 more — $66,000 · Other+8 moreTELLURIDE FOUNDATION — $390,000 · Recreation & SportsTELLURIDE FOUNDATIONMARTIN W RICHARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyMARTIN W RIC…THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RED SOX …THE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON MONTESSORI ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · EducationThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $15,000 · EducationPREP FOR PREP — $3,500 · EducationEDDIES HOUSE — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health
Other$1,016,000Recreation & Sports$390,000Philanthropy$200,000Human Services$120,000Education$43,500Housing & Shelter$25,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION — $390,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetMARTIN W RICHARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWASHINGTON MONTESSORI ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEDDIES HOUSE — $25,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT F KENNEDY CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAFS-USA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLOWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT WOMENS HALL OF FAME INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 97%
  • The Arc of Litchfield County Inc97% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teddy Ebersol's Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph