Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tecumseh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$2.0MEducation$1.4MYouth Development$826kFood & Nutrition$786kAnimals$739kRecreation & Sports$641kPublic Safety & Disaster$610kHuman Services$411kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO ACADEMY CA FUND$210,200
MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE$200,000
UPAYA ZEN CENTER$150,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
SAN MIGUEL COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$100,000
TELLURIDE MOUNTAIN CLUB$100,000
TELLURIDE SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER$100,000
TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
COMITIS CRISIS CENTER INC$100,000
EXPLORE AUSTIN$85,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$62,500
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$50,000
DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE$50,000
MOUNTAINFILM$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $502k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM: $50k → 16%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $63k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $50k → 10%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $100k → 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $25k → 10%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $100k → 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $13k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%SAME CAFE: $25k → 12%SAME CAFE: $25k → 12%SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER: $26k → 7%SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 7%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $3k → 10%THERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $3k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
WY
PA
CA
CO
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 53 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
54

Total granted

$8.3M
$997k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+10%

Still filing today

58%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $470k · revenue +23%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $467k · revenue +26%
  • AE
    AUSTIN EXPLORE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $459k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • CA
    CENTRAL AUSTIN HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $155k · revenue +498% · 96% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
5
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Safe in Austin Rescue Ranch

Our healing hearts program rescues animals from abuse, neglect or have a special need and introduces them to children and adults that suffer from the same backgrounds for some healing time at no cost.

Animals
7
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
10
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
11
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
12
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Dog Is My Copilot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/66
Grantees still filing
42/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO ACADEMY CA FUND: $1,291,210 · OtherCOLORADO ACADEMY CA FUNDCOMITIS CRISIS CENTER INC: $650,000 · OtherCOMITIS CRISIS CENTER INCSAN MIGUEL COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $405,000 · OtherSAN MIGUEL COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUECANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $365,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCETELLURIDE SCIENCE: $355,000 · OtherTELLURIDE SCIENCEIndividual grant recipient: $350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUPAYA ZEN CENTER INC: $250,000 · OtherPRODIGY VENTURES INC: $250,000 · OtherMOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE: $200,000 · Other+70 more: $1,477,473 · Other+70 moreTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $685,000 · HealthTHE TELLURIDE…Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $466,850 · HealthChildren's Ho…+4 more: $7,000 · HealthAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $459,262 · EducationAUSTIN EX…Ocean First Institute: $150,000 · EducationOcean Fir…Food For Thought Denver: $120,000 · EducationFood For …HAVERN CENTER INC: $50,000 · EducationHAVERN CE…YOUTHROOTS: $50,000 · EducationYOUTHROOT…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $470,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $6,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT WORTHMORE: $200,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTIN: $160,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC): $30,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $17,500 · Human Services+3 more: $12,261 · Human ServicesTelluride Mountain Club: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL AUSTIN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $155,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN METRO HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $85,000 · Recreation & SportsPease Park Conservancy: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports4ATX FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $278,000 · AnimalsEMANCIPET INC: $30,000 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsDOG IS MY COPILOT: $20,000 · Animals+3 more: $13,050 · Animals
Other$5,593,683Health$1,158,850Education$830,262Food & Nutrition$526,000Human Services$520,261Recreation & Sports$510,000Animals$366,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $685,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetCOMITIS CRISIS CENTER INC: $650,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $470,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $466,850 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $459,262 over 5y, 24% of budgetTELLURIDE SCIENCE: $355,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $278,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE: $200,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPROJECT WORTHMORE: $200,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTelluride Mountain Club: $200,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM: $160,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $160,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL AUSTIN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $155,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetOcean First Institute: $150,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetFood For Thought Denver: $120,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWEST AUSTIN YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $102,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN METRO HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $85,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChampions Off the Field: $67,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVERN CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTHROOTS: $50,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPease Park Conservancy: $40,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC): $30,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budget4ATX FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEMANCIPET INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUE NORTH YOUTH PROGRAM: $20,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSTART UP KIDS CLUB: $20,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOG IS MY COPILOT: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSki and Snowboard Club Vail: $10,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRODIGY VENTURES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN RISING PRODUCTIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetRoots & Wings International Ministries: $8,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAustin German Shepherd Rescue: $7,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHERAPY PET PALS OF TEXAS: $6,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMITIS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN EXPLORE INC ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT WORTHMORE ↗
  • Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINFILM ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AUSTIN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Ocean First Institute ↗
  • Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
  • Who funds WEST AUSTIN YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN METRO HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Champions Off the Field ↗
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVERN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHROOTS ↗
  • Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pease Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL RESOURCE CENTER (SMRC) ↗
  • Who funds 4ATX FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX33.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Cooper Matthews Foundation · Ecg Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · St David's Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Ebb Point Foundation- Blackrock

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tecumseh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tecumseh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tecumseh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tecumseh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tecumseh’s filings →

More from the funding graph