Skip to content
Techbridge Girls at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Techbridge Girls

Techbridge Girls prepares out-of-school time STEM educators and volunteer STEM professionals with training and curricula to promote access, belonging, and persistence in STEM.

$188k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Science & Tech$200kYouth Development$96kCommunity Improvement$70kEducation$59kHuman Services$42kHealth$26kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $87,783, the rows itemized in this filing. The $187,923 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $100,140 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$70,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Urban Fellows$70,000
Various Schools and Orgs$17,783
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $6k → 8%YMCA OF METRO LOS ANGELES: $6k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $6k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $6k → 16%YMCA OF MEMPHIS & MID-SOUTH: $6k → 17%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $6k → 8%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $6k → 15%YMCA OF METRO WASHINGTON: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc

Our mission is to put Judeo-Christian principles into practice though programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The YMCA of Greensboro is a volunteer-led public charity that includes men, women, and children of all ages,…

Human Services
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
4
Young Mens Christian Association

The montgomery ymca, reflecting its judeo-christian heritage, is an association of volunteers, members, and staff open to and serving all, providing programs and services which develop spirit, mind, and body. montgomery ymca statement of…

Human Services
5
Georgia Mountains Young Men's Christian Association Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs, services and relationships that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
6
Young Men's Christian Association

We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.

Human Services
7
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Charlotte

The ymca of greater charlotte is dedicated to putting christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. inspired by christian principles, we aim to enhance community well-being, equip…

Human Services
8
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)

Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.

Human Services
9
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
10
Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati

The mission of the YMCA of Greater Cincinnati is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. Counting members and program participants, the Y reaches more than 114,000 people…

Philanthropy
11
Young Men's Christian Assoc of Shawnee Ok

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
12
Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Denver

The mission of the ymca of metropolitan denver is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. the ymca of metropolitan denver is recognized as the area's largest provider of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Silicon Valley; the most unlike its peers is Somali Youth & Family Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Somali Youth & Family Club: $89,714 · OtherSomali Youth & Family ClubNATIONAL URBAN FELLOWS INC: $70,000 · OtherNATIONAL URBAN FELLOWS INCUCSF: $25,958 · OtherUCSFUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $25,958 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOVarious Schools and Orgs: $17,783 · OtherVarious Schools and OrgsNational Society of Black Engineers: $200,000 · Science & TechNational Society of Black EngineersYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS…Young Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah: $6,000 · Human ServicesYoung Mens…Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $6,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men'…Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $6,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men'…YMCA OF MEMPHIS & THE MID-SOUTH: $6,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF ME…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'…YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368): $6,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GR…DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $14,850 · EducationWOMEN OF AT&T INC: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Other$229,413Science & Tech$200,000Human Services$48,000Education$14,850Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Society of Black Engineers: $200,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSomali Youth & Family Club: $89,714 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN FELLOWS INC: $70,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $14,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN OF AT&T INC: $7,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association Of Northern Utah: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF MEMPHIS & THE MID-SOUTH: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368): $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council of Y…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Council of YMCAs of the USAIL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Techbridge Girls funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Techbridge Girls. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Techbridge Girls’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home