Skip to content

· Private foundation

Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$372k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$605kCrime & Legal$350kFood & Nutrition$290kReligion$240kHuman Services$200kPhilanthropy$200kHousing & Shelter$93kEnvironment$91kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $347k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT MARY'S FOOD BANK$45,000
CIVITAN FOUNDATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$40,000
RIVER FUND$40,000
VITA NOVA$25,000
ELS FOR AUTISM$20,000
SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND$15,000
SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER$11,500
TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,000
BULLHEAD REGIONAL FULLER CENTER$10,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$10,000
CHASIN' A DREAM FOUNDATION$10,000
CASA MARIA SOUP KITCHEN$10,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELDERHELP: $10k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%CHASIN' A DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%CHASIN' A DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%VITA NOVA: $25k → 11%VITA NOVA: $25k → 11%VITA NOVA: $25k → 11%VITA NOVA: $25k → 11%VITA NOVA: $20k → 11%VITA NOVA: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NV
CA
AZ
NM
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 23 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$2.1M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+11%

Still filing today

61%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CIVITAN FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $265k · revenue +83%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +63%
  • RF
    RIVER FUND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • LF
    LEGACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • EO
    ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services

To provide comprehensive, family-centered social, educational and behavioral health services that encourage children, adolescents and their families to lead self reliant, stable and productive lives.

Human Services
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
El Paso Guidance Center Inc dba El Paso Child Guidance Center

Improving the health and well-being of children and families in a safe environment through mental health services, education and awareness.

—
4
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
5
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
6
La Vida Felicidad Inc

Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.

—
7
Interim Inc

Interim, inc.'s mission is to provide services and affordable housing to supporting members of our community with mental illness in building productive and satisfying lives.

—
8
New Vista Ranch Inc

New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.

Human Services
9
San Diego Center for Children

Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…

Human Services
10
Arc of Maui County

Helping the intellectually challenged, arc of maui county is dedicated to provide or secure the opportunity for all people whom we represent and assist to set, choose and realize their goals of where or how they will learn, live, work and…

Human Services
11
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
12
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhelp of San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Nami California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIVITAN FOUNDATION INC: $265,000 · OtherCIVITAN FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $265,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAINT MARY'S FOOD BANK: $260,000 · OtherSAINT MARY'S FOOD BANKRIVER VALLEY ARTIST GUILD INC: $41,000 · OtherLEGACY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERBIG SISTER OF PALM: $40,000 · OtherSister Jose Women's Center: $38,000 · Other+13 more: $187,000 · Other+13 moreSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $185,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST AUTISM…ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $120,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM F…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $240,000 · ReligionDIOCESAN COU…Vita Nova Inc: $125,000 · Human ServicesVita Nova …THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCE…CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHASIN A D…ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 · Human ServicesRIVER FUND INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER FUND…+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $60,000 · EnvironmentTERRA CULTURA: $31,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,136,000Health$315,000Religion$240,000Human Services$210,000Philanthropy$203,000Environment$60,000Food & Nutrition$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIVITAN FOUNDATION INC: $265,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $240,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER FUND INC: $200,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $185,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVita Nova Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $60,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTERRA CULTURA: $31,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF VACUUM COATERS: $30,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetQUANTUM HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DUNBAR CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNAMI California: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUILD A MIRACLE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CIVITAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds RIVER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Vita Nova Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds TERRA CULTURA ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF VACUUM COATERS ↗
  • Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds QUANTUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DUNBAR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI California ↗
  • Who funds BUILD A MIRACLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Vita Nova Inc: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Teaumen & Grace Fuite’s filings →

More from the funding graph