How much did TEAUMEN & GRACE FUITE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of TEAUMEN & GRACE FUITE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $31k
$10k–50k15 grants · $347k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAINT MARY'S FOOD BANK$45,000
CIVITAN FOUNDATION$45,000
CHAVES COUNTY CASA$45,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$40,000
RIVER FUND$40,000
VITA NOVA$25,000
ELS FOR AUTISM$20,000
SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND$15,000
SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER$11,500
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$10,000
TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,000
BULLHEAD REGIONAL FULLER CENTER$10,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$10,000
CASA MARIA SOUP KITCHEN$10,000
CHASIN' A DREAM FOUNDATION$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.7M · 19 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.7M

$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+93%

Still filing today

47%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyScience & TechEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CF
CIVITAN FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +44%
SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL
5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +109%
VN
VITA NOVA
5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +107%

Funded once

LF
LEGACY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $40k
E
ELDERHELP
one grant, 2021 · $10k
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Virgin Islands Volunteer Advocates

Virgin islands volunteer advocates (viva) for children was created as a legal umbrella to host programs designed to work with children who have been abused or neglected.

Crime & Legal

Vista Maria

We foster restorative relationships and deliver innovative care, treatment, and education so that vulnerable youth and families believe in their worth, heal and build the skills for success.

—

Latinos in Virginia Empowerment

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

Crime & Legal

Viva Farms

We empower aspiring and limited-resource farmers by providing bilingual training in holistic organic farming practices, as well as access to land, infrastructure, equipment, marketing, and capital.

Food & Nutrition

Villa Anita Inc

Villa anita is a museum devoted to educating guests about the creative reuse of materials and sustainable way of life in the american desert. providing artist with a place to create their art while providing workshops and art classes for…

Arts & Culture

Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—

The Arc of Ventura County Inc

The arc of ventura county, inc. provides services and support to people with (see schedule o) intellectual and developmental disabilities to achieve their goals toward a life of opportunity, choice, participation, and contribution.

Human Services

Casa of Ventura County Inc

To recruit, train, and supervise lay volunteers who become child advocates for abused and neglected children in juvenile dependency proceedings; to educate the general public and those persons, offices, and institutions concerned with the…

Crime & Legal

Casa of the Continental Divide

Court-appointed trained volunteers advocate in court for the best interest of children who are victims of abuse and neglect in the 5th judicial district of colorado in order to find them safe and permanent homes.

Civil Rights

Victim Advocates Reaching Out

Crisis intervention and prevention programs for victims of violent crime and trauma via emotional support, emergency services, and temporary shelter.

Health

Valley Verde

Valley verde increases self-sufficiency, health, and resilience, through a culturally informed community based food system to promote food justice.

Human Services

California Vocations Inc

The organization provides residential and vocation support to persons with developmental disabilities.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civitan Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Society of Vacuum Coaters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

13/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,179,000Human Services$355,000Philanthropy$163,000Environment$50,000Food & Nutrition$41,000Science & Tech$25,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA4.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEAUMEN & GRACE FUITE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ST VINCENT DE PAUL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 860570967 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ST VINCENT DE PAUL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 25% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEAUMEN & GRACE FUITE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation?

More from the funding graph

TEAUMEN & GRACE FUITE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teaumen & Grace Fuite Foundation?

More from the funding graph