How much did TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION reported 13 grants totaling $580,409 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION based?

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION is based in CA.

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION

Improving education in developing countries through innovative technology solutions.

$580k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$15k

Largest

01What you fund

0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Education$240kHuman Services$226kInternational$116kCommunity Improvement$90kYouth Development$60kPhilanthropy$15kHealth$15kOther$113k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

teachunitedwwwabroadpotentialglobalruraltraining

2021

youthentrepreneurshipunderserveddigitalskills

2022

youthdigitalunderservedentrepreneurshipskills

2023

rural kenyahealthwomenindiayouth buildugandaempower

2024

womenrural kenyahealthugandagirlsyouthcommitted

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

FLYING KITES$15,000
DIGITAL NEST INC$15,000
ASOCIACION KANTAYA$15,000
INDIGENOUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TANZANIA IEFTZ (ORKEESWA)$15,000
CASME (CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE AND MATH EDUCATION)$15,000
THE AFRICAN SOUP INC$15,000
SOUL FOUNDATION$15,000
AGAHOZO SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE (ASYV)$15,000
EK TARA (HER FUTURE COALITION)$15,000
BUILD$15,000
WOMEN LIGHT THE WORLD$15,000
FAR AWAY FRIENDS UGANDA$15,000
KENYA CONNECT$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$728k · 18 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$728k

$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

-1%

Still filing today

89%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

K
KIDSPIRE
3× · 2018–2020 · $90k · revenue +2%
DN
DIGITAL NEST INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +529%
CC
COOP CAREERS INC
3× · 2021–2023 · $45k · revenue +21213%

Funded once

CF
CONSORTIUM FOR SCHOOL NETWORK
one grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue -1%
DE
DOST EDUCATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +569%
W
WORLDREADER
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Digital Divide Data

Digital divide data was established to create a better future for disadvantaged youth through employment and education. through its high impact work-study programs, associates are employed and supported to complete their high school…

—

Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International

Connectedconectando Educacion

To improve access, quality and relevance of education for youth in rural central america.

Philanthropy

The Pangea Network

The Pangea Network is dedicated to empowering women and youth in Kenya and in the U.S. with the knowledge, skills and ongoing network of support in order to achieve their dreams and make positive, life-changing contributions in the…

Human Services

Growth Through Learning Inc

Supporting education and development for young women in kenya, tanzania and uganda

Education

Global Learning Exchange Initiative

To empower elementary school children in Guatemala by providing access to an unparalleled literacy curriculum and professional teacher training that creates new opportunity pathways for the next generation.

International

Yours Humanly

We transform the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources.

Education

Empower African Children

Transform the lives of orphaned and vulnerable children through the power of innovative education.

—

Alliance for Children Everywhere

Providing schooling, food, and baby formula for impoverished children of zambia, africa

International

Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International

Impact Network International Inc

To improve the lives of children residing in rural villages across education, health and economic development sectors. in 2023, impact network supported zambia impact network limited to achieve its goals in zambia. the main program is to…

International

Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures fights extreme poverty through dignified jobs. Founded in 2011, Upaya provides investment and consulting support to early-stage businesses aimed at creating jobs for people living in extreme poverty.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flying Kites Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dost Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

14/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$239,600Human Services$226,119International$116,259Other$112,768Community Improvement$90,000Youth Development$60,000Philanthropy$15,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA18.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEACHUNITED.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~31 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270490843 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEACHUNITED, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 31 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Team4tech Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Team4tech Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Team4tech Foundation?

More from the funding graph

TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Team4tech Foundation?

More from the funding graph